recommended reading

Despite Test Failure, Pentagon Remains Confident About Missile Defense

Defense Department spokesman George Little on Monday voiced continued confidence in U.S. missile defenses against any possible attack from East Asia, even though a long-range missile interceptor failed late last week in yet another flight test, ABC News reported.

"We believe that we have a robust missile defense architecture in place and we are in a position to respond to any threat that emanates from North Korea," the spokesman said. "Our faith in our missile defense programs remains strong and every healthy organization takes stock of mishaps when they occur and that's what we're doing now."

It is not yet publicly known why the Ground-based Interceptor failed to eliminate the dummy ballistic missile target against which it was launched over the Pacific Ocean. The Defense Department has said it would conduct a thorough review to learn what went wrong.

Thirty GBI missiles fielded at bases in Alaska and California use the targeting system that failed in the test. They are part of the country's Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, which is the principal defense against ballistic missile strikes by North Korea and Iran.

The Pentagon in March announced it would acquire an additional 14 GBI missiles for fielding by 2017 in Alaska as a countermeasure to the growing missile threat posed by Pyongyang. A number of Republicans on Capitol Hill are also clamoring for the speedy establishment of an interceptor site somewhere on the U.S. East Coast that presumably would be equipped with more GBI missiles. 

The growing role that the GBI system plays in U.S. homeland missile defense made Friday's test all the more important, even though the Defense Department had suggested beforehand that it would proceed with acquisition of the 14 additional interceptors regardless of the outcome of the intercept attempt.

There has not been a successful GBI test intercept since 2008. The three most recent efforts all failed.

"The technology is still being perfected, and the level of reliability is not up to necessary standards," senior technical analyst Charles Vick said.

Little cautioned against reaching "any broad conclusions" about the most recent testing failure. "I understand the concerns here," he said. "We're concerned, too."

The probable outcome of the testing failure will be that more than one GBI missile will have to be launched against each single warhead threat to ensure elimination, according to Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance founder Riki Ellison.

"We must have the fortitude to fix the issues that caused the failures quickly, soundly and as soon as possible, he said. "This system is all our nation has today to stop and intercept long-range nuclear missiles. We have to have it."

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.