recommended reading

Bid Protests Stop Clock on $3.5 Billion Navy Network Contract

This story has been updated. 

Computer Sciences Corp. and Harris Corp. filed protests with the Government Accountability Office Monday against the Navy’s award of its Next-Generation Enterprise Network contract to HP Enterprise Services.

The deal – valued at $3.5 billion over five years -- will replace the current Navy Marine Corps Intranet contract next year. NGEN will serve 800,000 Navy and Marine users located in the United States, but not overseas.

During a media briefing following the June 27 award, Sean Stackley, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, said HP came in with a lower price than the other bidder on the contract, Computer Sciences Corp. CSC had partnered with Harris on its bid.

Warren Suss, president of Suss Consulting, said he was not surprised by the protests, as both CSC and Harris “invested a lot of money in their bids. Companies now build in a protest as part of their ‘win’ strategy.”

The Navy wants to switch to NGEN by April 2014. HP and predecessor EDS have operated the Navy Marine Corps Intranet since 2000, under a $10 billion contract followed by a continuity of services contract valued at $6.9 billion if it runs through September 2014.

GAO said it would decide the CSC and Harris protests by Oct. 23, adding three months to the timetable for the transition. A delay in the transition due to the protests would give the Navy grounds to extend the continuity of services contract beyond next September if needed, Suss said.

HP partnered with AT&T Government Solutions, IBM Global Business Services Federal, Lockheed Martin Services and Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. on its NGEN bid. CSC teamed with Dell, General Dynamics and Verizon, in addition to Harris.

A spokesman for HP Enterprise Services said in an emailed statement, "The NGEN solicitation and evaluation process was rigorous and thorough. HPES has every confidence in the Navy’s evaluation and selection of HPES to continue to meet the Navy’s IT services needs."

CSC and Harris declined to comment on their protests.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.