recommended reading

Hagel Presses Air Force for Details on Discipline of Nuclear Missile Staffers

Defense Department

The Air Force must provide further details on its recent decision to remove 17 intercontinental ballistic missile control personnel from their positions at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said on Wednesday.

The service took steps against 17 missile workers after a March audit indicated their grasp of firing procedures was "marginal," the Associated Press reported. The disciplined service members are undergoing remedial preparation and would go back to their posts in roughly 60 days, the Air Force indicated.

The service said ICBM protections and safety were not undermined by the situation at Minot.

“The idea that we have people not performing to the standard we expect will never be good and we won’t tolerate it,” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said in testimony to lawmakers.

He said some staffers believe Washington's openness to pursuing further atomic arms cuts would ultimately spell an end to the Air Force nuclear mission. “That’s actually not the case, but that’s the view when you’re in the operational force,” Welsh said. “We have to deal with that.”

The identification of problems within the 91st Missile Wing indicates the service has grown more adept at identifying internal problems, according to Air Force Secretary Michael Donley. The disciplined personnel held missile control positions typically occupied by relatively inexperienced staffers, he added.

Auditors rated as "excellent" the missile firing knowledge of separate ICBM command groups at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana and F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, the Air Force indicated on Wednesday. The appraisals were the equivalent of "B" grades for the two units, which each oversee 150 Minuteman 3 ICBMS.

Personnel in the 91st Missile Wing have sometimes decided against confronting or informing superiors of colleagues who act in breach of procedures, unit deputy chief Lt. Col. Jay Folds said by e-mail. Unit personnel had deliberately acted in breach of accident prevention standards on one or more occasions, he indicated.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.