recommended reading

Special Operations Command Plans to Link Its Networks With Allies

Navy Adm. William McRaven, commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 5, 2013.

Navy Adm. William McRaven, commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 5, 2013. // Evan Vucci/AP

The U.S. Special Operations Command’s computer networks must be interconnected with those of partner nations’ special forces to facilitate information sharing, the head of the command told a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday.

Adm. William McRaven said his command will “provide information technology infrastructure and communications services to unite U.S. and partner nation [special forces], plus other mission partners. This communications infrastructure will leverage existing networks and systems to avoid duplication of effort.” He did not provide any details.

The Special Operations Command requested a $97 million budget for communications in fiscal 2013, still not fully approved by Congress. The request includes funding for long-haul wideband commercial circuits and satellite airtime for deployed troops and unmanned aerial vehicles.

Tactical communications is handled by the command’s SOF Deployable Node, a family of wideband satellite communications systems. McRaven said the command will continue to deply this equimemnt and work to shrink the size of the gear that handles secure voice, video and data transmissions. Special Operations proposed $2.3 million for the SOF deployable Node in its fiscal 2013 budget, up $900,000 from $1.4 million in fiscal 2012. This includes satellite terminals capable of transmitting while on the move.

McRaven said special operations forces operate both small and large unmanned aerial vehicles used by the Air Force and that his command has the “ability to efficiently modify” them with “capabilities such as high definition full motion video, [which] provides game-changing, operational effects at relatively small investment.”

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.