recommended reading

Yes, the Army will still be relevant, even after Afghanistan

U.S. Army Gen. Ray Odierno

U.S. Army Gen. Ray Odierno // Defense Department

The Army does not need a bumper sticker to sum up its relevance as the Pentagon shifts its focus from 11 years of ground war in the Middle East to the air and sea forces needed to support the new military strategy centered on the Asia Pacific region that President Obama unveiled in January.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raymond T. Odierno said he was “frustrated” with questions on how the service would fit into a strategy that emphasized the air-sea battleground, adding there is “a large role for the Army” in the new strategy. Whatever the focus, the Defense Department needs a flexible ground force that, among other things, provides extensive logistics support to the other components. Any military strategy must include a balance of forces, Odierno told a press briefing at the Association of United States Army’s annual meeting Monday.

Army Secretary John McHugh said the service considers itself a “full partner” in development of the Pentagon’s “air-sea battle” strategy and pointed out that the armed forces for 22 of 28 Asia-Pacific nations are led by land force commanders.

As the Army prepares for a shift of focus, Odierno said it must develop a network that “reaches down to every soldier” on the battlefield and delivers the “right information” in a complex tactical environment.

The ongoing Army Network Integration Evaluation Exercise, which runs through November at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., includes tests of systems that will support a critical piece of the service’s next-generation tactical network -- command and control on the move, Odierno said.

The Defense Acquisition Board in September cleared production of the Warrior Information Network-Tactical Increment 2, built by General Dynamics C4 Systems, which provides broadband communications capabilities via satellite or terrestrial signals for infantry companies, brigades and divisions. It is designed to provide on-the-move command-and-control capabilities.

Paul Mehney, a spokesman for the Army’s System of Systems Integration Directorate, said on Oct. 2 that WIN-T Increment 2 still faces what he called “challenges” with high-band networking waveform for terrestrial communications, a 30-meter tall mast to extend range; and the soldier network extension, which is intended to provide network connections to company commanders.

The Army plans to spend $6.1 billion on WIN-T through 2018.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.