recommended reading

Study claims drones haven't made Americans any safer

United States Air Force

A new study by law professors at Stanford and New York University found that drones strikes have killed far more civilians in Pakistan than the U.S. has acknowledged and that the program has a "damaging and counterproductive effect." The crux of the study released on Tuesday, entitled "Living Under Drones", was interviews with 130 civilians and 69 survivors in the region of northern Pakistan where drone strikes occur. They found that interviewees have been traumatized by the drone strikes and that "real people are suffering real harm," according to one of the study's authors. The Los Angeles Times's David Zucchino adds, "The Obama administration has championed the use of remotely-operated drones for killing senior Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders, but the study concludes that only about 2% of drone casualties are top militant leaders."

One of the more disturbing facets of this study is the fact that the estimates of civilian deaths vary so wildly that it seems like blind guessing would yield a more accurate number. Estimates range from 474 to 884 civilian deaths since 2004 according to one organization, while another says 138 since 2006. And the idea of drones killing civilians and fueling anti-American sentiment among Pakistanis obviously resonates in the wake of the recent anti-American protests spurred by the incendiary anti-Islamic film Innocence of Muslims. "Living Under Drones" also links up with astudy by the Pew Research Center from June which found that 74 percent of Pakistanis considered the U.S. an "enemy." 

Click here to read the entire story.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.