recommended reading

Federal guidance on WikiLeaks raises legal questions

The government might not have the right to restrict federal employees and contractors from viewing on their personal home computers the classified material that WikiLeaks posted, said Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis School of Law with expertise in whistleblower protections and national security.

On Dec. 3, OMB's general counsel office sent a notice to agency general counsels instructing them to remind employees they should not view materials that WikiLeaks posted because the information remains classified.

The memo said federal employees and contractors "shall not . . . access documents that are marked classified," on computers that access nonclassified government systems, including employees' or contractors' personally owned computers.

Clark said the guidance is unclear as to whether employees could access the leaked documents on a personal computer that does not access government systems. OMB did not return a call or e-mail seeking clarification.

"It seems to be fear-mongering," Clark said. The notion that agencies would tell employees they could not view the documents on their home computers "is inexplicable to me," she said.

"I don't think there's any legal authority to assert employees who have security clearances cannot access particular information through their home computers," Clark said.

Both the Defense and State departments told employees and contractors not to access the information, but neither made a distinction between personal and private computers.

Defense's guidance says U.S. military, civilian and contractor employees "should not access the WikiLeaks website to view or download publicized classified information," according to Maj. Chris Perrine, a Defense Department spokesman. Doing so could introduce classified information on unclassified networks, creating "spillage," which is costly to clean up, Perrine said.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.