recommended reading

Defense IG: Navy failed to validate contractor bills for unmanned systems program

The Navy did not validate invoices worth $329.3 million that Northrop Grumman Corp. submitted for development of a remotely piloted aircraft the service will use to conduct high-altitude ocean reconnaissance, the Defense Department inspector general said in a report issued on Dec. 23.

Northrop Grumman won the Navy's $1.2 billion Broad Area Maritime Surveillance Unmanned Aircraft System development and low-rate production contract in April 2008 with a proposal to integrate maritime sensor systems on the high-flying Global Hawk UAS it produces for the Air Force.

In February 2009, Northrop Grumman received a revised development contract worth $627 million, bringing the total value of the contract to $1.8 billion. The Navy plans to deploy 40 BAMS UAS to five bases around the world with the overall cost estimated at $19 billion, the Defense IG estimated.

Since the Navy and Air Force both use the same Global Hawk airframe, the BAMS program, which the Naval Air Systems Command manages, was expected to share more than $150 million worth of government-furnished equipment with the Air Force, according to the Defense IG.

But, the report said, NAVAIR did not establish with the Air Force a complete property-sharing agreement, which should have covered more than 5,000 specialized tools and test equipment.

NAVAIR contracting officials and program managers did not review any bills from Northrop Grumman prior to payment, and as a result, approved bills for $22.6 million and $21.8 million lacking any detail, auditors found.

According to the report, this failure resulted from poor contract oversight on the part of the Defense Contract Management Agency in Bethpage, N.Y., home of Northrop Grumman's integrated systems sector.

In addition, NAVAIR failed to provide contract specialists with appropriate training, the report said.

Diane Balderson, NAVAIR's assistant commander of contracts, said contracting officials had completed the required training, as well as additional training last month.

Balderson said the Air Force, Navy and Northrop Grumman will work closely to leverage assets from the two services' UAS programs, which will save millions of dollars in unnecessary costs.

Northrop Grumman officials did not respond to a request for comment.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.