recommended reading

Trump Acknowledges Russian Hacking, Points to Poor Defenses

President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the lobby of Trump Tower in New York, Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2017.

President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the lobby of Trump Tower in New York, Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2017. // Evan Vucci/AP

Russia hacked Democratic political organizations in a campaign to sow chaos during the 2016 election, President-elect Donald Trump acknowledged for the first time Wednesday.

But that’s not the real issue, Trump said during his first press conference since the election.

Echoing an emerging theme of the Trump transition, the president-elect insisted America’s broader cyber vulnerabilities should be the real focus, rather than Russia’s information campaign, which U.S. intelligence leaders say was partly directed at aiding Trump’s election.

» Get the best federal technology news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

“We have no defense,” Trump told reporters. “We’re run by people that don’t know what they’re doing.”

Trump did not directly respond to a question about whether he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the breaches or if he would reverse or curtail a series of actions President Barack Obama took last month to punish Russia for its information operations.

He called the Russian hacking operation “bad,” but added people should also consider the damaging information exposed by the leak, including internal conflicts within Hillary Clinton's campaign. He also criticized the Democratic National Committee for having poor “hacking defense.”

“As far as hacking, I think it was Russia, but I think we also get hacked by other countries,” Trump said.

He later suggested other actors might have compromised DNC networks also. That allegation has not been backed up by intelligence agencies or by private-sector cybersecurity firms that examined DNC servers, though it would not be unusual for other nations’ spy agencies to attempt to breach a political organization’s networks.

“We’re hacked by everybody,” Trump said, referencing a report from a little-known cybersecurity firm that listed government last among 17 industries in the maturity of its cyber defense.

Trump reiterated a pledge to launch a 90-day cybersecurity review to raise U.S. digital defenses, which he said will be spearheaded, in part, by the intelligence community. The president-elect earlier suggested the review would be led by the Defense Department, raising concerns about military interference in a realm traditionally managed by civilian agencies.

Currently, the Homeland Security Department is responsible for the cybersecurity of civilian government agencies and for aiding the private sector in securing critical infrastructure, including, as of last week, election systems.

“We have some of the greatest computer minds anywhere in the world that we’ve assembled,” Trump said. “We’re going to put those minds together and we’re going to form a defense.”

Trump’s statements echoed those made by his Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson earlier in the day.

Asked if he would advise Trump to reverse or roll back Obama’s executive orders punishing Russia, Tillerson replied that “what’s really required is a comprehensive assessment of our cyber threats or cybersecurity policies…We do not have a cybersecurity policy. We do not have a comprehensive strategy around a threat.”

Tillerson acknowledged the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia was responsible for the breaches and said he believes such an operation could only have been directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. He declined to fully endorse the intelligence conclusions, however, because he has not had a classified briefing on the topic.

Attorney General Nominee Jeff Sessions similarly hedged during the first day of his confirmation hearings Tuesday while Homeland Security nominee Gen. John Kelly said he has “high confidence” in the conclusion.

Trump also attacked intelligence officials during his press conference for allegedly leaking a report containing unverified and salacious charges against him. That report was published by Buzzfeed news Tuesday evening.

“I think it’s disgraceful that intelligence agencies allowed any information that turned out to be so false and fake [to be released],” he said, adding “that’s something that Nazi Germany would have done and did do.”

The disputed report was not produced by U.S. intelligence agencies and there’s no evidence intelligence officials were responsible for leaking it.

The incident could further damage an already icy relationship between Trump and the intelligence agencies he will soon lead.

The president-elect criticized Democrats and the Obama administration for responding more forcefully to the DNC hacks than to other breaches, especially the 2015 China-linked breach at the Office of Personnel Management, which compromised sensitive security clearance information about more than 20 million current and former federal employees and their families.

“They didn’t make a big deal out of that,” he said.

In fact, the government created a new security clearance agency in the wake of the OPM breach that is secured by the Defense Department rather than by civilian information security workers. However, the U.S. government did not publicly attribute nor retaliate against China following the breach.

Outgoing Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has explained that disparity by describing the OPM breach as the sort of traditional espionage operation that U.S. spy agencies also engage in. Russian breaches at the DNC and the Clinton campaign fall outside that category because they leaked the information to WikiLeaks and elsewhere in an effort to undermine Clinton’s campaign and boost Trump.

“People who live in glasses houses,” Clapper told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee last week, should not get too worked up about traditional espionage.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.