recommended reading

Anti-Hacking Laws Hamper Private Efforts to Hunt Cybercriminals

Tatiana Popova/

Public-private partnerships can take years to clinch cybercrime cases due to privacy laws, according to one security provider that cooperates with authorities worldwide. 

Tokyo-based Trend Micro every day monitors a proprietary stash of statistics on the activity of individuals participating in the "underground economy" of crimeware sales. The database tracks publicly accessible online marketplaces that peddle in, among other things, $160 malicious software, $25 private networks for masking identities, and $100 services that check whether antivirus vendors have discovered the malware yet. 

When transactions suggesting a coordinated plot begin to pile up, the company's policy, at least in America, bans mingling with the suspects or penetrating their accounts to investigate further, said Max Goncharov, Trend Micro senior threat researcher. 

For example, the vendor in 2007 began picking up the trail of what turned out to be a "botnet" compromising 4 million infected computers that criminals had hijacked remotely to do their bidding -- from spreading additional malware to clicking on paid advertisements. But the FBI did not shutdown the operation until 2011. 

"They need us, because there are not enough cyber defenders in the government," Trend Micro Chief Technology Officer Raimund Genes said. "We have well paid experts who have been around for a quite a while and build a reputation -- offering this in a government job is very unlikely."

Under the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, it is illegal for private researchers to hack command and control servers, even if they determine those machines have overtaken innocent people's computers. 

If Trend Micro uncovers suspicious activity, then it hands over data to the FBI. And then it's up to federal authorities to rebuild the case, Genes explained. Unlike Trend Micro, the feds can infiltrate hacker groups and obtain warrants to access their private accounts. In the botnet case, dubbed Ghost Click, the FBI seized computers and servers. Many Asian countries look the other way when researchers, including experts from Trend Micro, try to hack into the hackers systems, Genes said. 

Some civil liberties groups say authorities misuse the 1986 hacking law by arresting computer scientists who find vulnerabilities in systems, and they flout other privacy laws by procuring emails without a warrant.  

Earlier this month, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other Internet activists denounced the sentencing of Andrew "Weev" Auernheimer for informing the media that AT&T had configured its servers to allow the harvesting of iPad owners' unsecured email addresses.

"Weev is facing more than three years in prison because he pointed out that a company failed to protect its users' data, even though his actions didn't harm anyone," EFF Senior Staff Attorney Marcia Hofmann said in a statement. "The punishments for computer crimes are seriously off-kilter, and Congress needs to fix them." The foundation has joined Auernheimer’s legal team to appeal the decision. 

(Image via Tatiana Popova/

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Software vulnerability

Hundreds of Thousands of Job Seekers' Information May Have Been Compromised by Hackers

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.