recommended reading

GOP Senators assail White House for pushing executive order on cybersecurity

Sens. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and John McCain, R-Ariz., co-wrote the piece with Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas.

Sens. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., and John McCain, R-Ariz., co-wrote the piece with Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas. // J. Scott Applewhite/AP file photo

Top Republican critics of a White House-backed Senate cybersecurity bill on Thursday criticized the White House’s threat to issue an executive order on the issue.

Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., penned a Wall Street Journal op-ed decrying White House plans to “tighten the government's grip.”

No final decision on an executive order has been made, but the White House has said issuing one is among the options possible if Congress remains deadlocked on the cybersecurity legislation. “An executive order is one of a number of measures we’re considering as we look to implement the president’s direction to do absolutely everything we can to better protect our nation against today’s cyberthreats,” Caitlin Hayden, spokeswoman for President Obama’s National Security Council, said in a statement.

The White House wants more authority to enforce security standards for a limited number of the most critical private computer networks, like those that control the electric grid or chemical plants, but Republicans say that would lead to cumbersome and expensive regulations for businesses.

“Unilateral action in the form of government mandates on the private sector creates an adversarial relationship instead of a cooperative one,” the GOP senators wrote.

The senators and the White House agree that an executive order couldn’t accomplish everything needed to boost cybersecurity. Legislation is needed to revise privacy laws and allow businesses to share more cyberthreat information with each other and the government.

“Cybersecurity is a priority, but anything less than a strong information-sharing bill, based on policies that enhance national security and the economy, will fall short,” the trio wrote.

Privacy groups have raised concerns about information-sharing provisions considered in Congress, but the Republican critics say Democrats' information-sharing proposals go too far to protect privacy by restricting cyber information from being used for other national-security purposes.

“What the country cannot afford is to build bureaucratic walls around information once it is shared with the federal government,” the senators wrote. “The 9/11 Commission was clear about providing government agencies with the ability to speak to each other about the threats facing all aspects of our security.”

Many Democrats have called on Obama to move forward with an executive order. Thursday’s op-ed was not the first time Republicans have opposed such a move. On Tuesday, the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, Sen. Dan Coats, R-Ind., also criticized the idea of unilateral White House action.

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Software vulnerability

Hundreds of Thousands of Job Seekers' Information May Have Been Compromised by Hackers

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.