recommended reading

Lawmakers, industry spar over cybersecurity standards

The American flag f, ... ]

The American flag f, ... ] // AP file photo

While Senate lawmakers wrangle over compromises that could bring cybersecurity legislation up for a final vote, industry and advocacy groups are lining up to make sure their interests are represented in the bill.

The Senate is debating a procedural vote that could allow the chamber to move ahead with the Cybersecurity Act (S.3414). Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is hoping to vote on the motion to proceed on Thursday if Republicans and others can be assured that their amendments will be considered. If no agreement is reached, a vote could be held on Friday.

The bill's sponsors say that their proposals are a good compromise between establishing fully mandatory cybersecurity standards and the status quo, where companies are left alone to secure their networks.

Originally, the Cybersecurity Act would have allowed the Homeland Security Department to set and enforce standards for certain critical infrastructure networks. Under the compromise language, standards would be developed by a multiagency committee and businesses.

Republicans, however, are echoing industry concerns that the bill’s provisions could become regulations, and Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said that a substitute bill, the Secure IT Act, will be introduced as an amendment.

Meanwhile, that debate played out on the sidelines where businesses increased their lobbying efforts ahead of a possible vote.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday pinned cybersecurity as a “key vote” and said it strongly opposes the Cybersecurity Act, despite the compromise language.

“The chamber believes that, at a minimum, more time is needed for the Senate to more fully assess this deeply flawed proposal,” the group said in a letter sent to Capitol Hill, in which it endorses the GOP's Secure IT Act. “While the program is being characterized as ‘voluntary,’ and participating entities may receive limited protection from punitive damages resulting from a cyber incident, the standards could be used to impose new obligations on participating companies.”

That was a message echoed by IBM, which sent a letter of its own to lawmakers on Thursday. The incentives for companies to enact standards aren’t strong enough, and the Cybersecurity Act could still allow agencies to establish mandatory rules, wrote Christopher Padilla, IBM’s vice president for governmental programs.

“The ‘voluntary’ performance requirements envisioned in S. 3414 would quickly transform into a de facto government regulatory scheme on privately owned critical infrastructure,” he said in the letter.

As Kevin Richards, vice president of the industry advocacy group TechAmerica, told reporters on Thursday: “We want to make sure standards are voluntary-voluntary rather than mandatory voluntary.”

The bill’s lead sponsor, Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., defended the need for standards to protect certain critical networks, even if they are owned by private companies.

“Since antiquity, societies have chosen to adopt safety standards to protect the physical structures of everyday life--starting with the homes we live in, but also our offices, factories, and critical infrastructure, like power plants and dams,” he said in a floor speech.

And not all companies oppose Lieberman’s bill. Oracle and Cisco, for example, signaled on Thursday that while they hope to continue to work on the standards issue, they support the bill.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.