recommended reading

House cybersecurity activist bemoans apathy about countering threats

This week's hacker attacks on credit card and other consumer websites in the wake of the WikiLeaks controversy provide a perfect example of America's vulnerability to attacks against online networks by criminals, spies and enemy states, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, co-founder of the House Cybersecurity Caucus, said Thursday.

McCaul said he sees a frustrating "lack of interest" in countering the threat among many in Congress, whose "eyes glaze over at these high-tech issues they don't understand." A similar disregard for terrorism threats was apparent in the days leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks, he added.

Speaking at a Cybersecurity Insider Series event that Government Executive, the SANS Institute and Northrop Grumman sponsored, McCaul described the career events that led him in September 2008 to join with Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I., to start the bipartisan House Cybersecurity Caucusto foment dialogue among members on a subject under the jurisdiction of multiple committees.

McCaul's work on a 2008 commission the Center for Strategic and International Studies runs revealed that every federal agency has been hit by cyberattacks in which unauthorized parties have downloaded the equivalent of all the data in the Library of Congress.

Increasingly, the U.S. military is recognizing that cyber threats during the next decade must be the top priority "from a business and national security standpoint," he said. "Many terrorist organizations don't have the capability, but they could contract with, say, the Russian mafia. If you take down the Northwest's electrical grid or a financial system, you do more economic damage than you do by flying a plane into a building."

The government's approach to countering cyber threats suffers from a lack of coordination among agencies to meet a challenge made difficult by the fact that the private sector controls much of the Internet, McCaul said.

He has offered legislation to elevate the status of the White House cybersecurity coordinator and special assistant to the president, a position held first by Melissa Hathaway and now occupied by Howard Schmidt. Without authority over agencies' cybersecurity budgets, McCaul said, the so-called czar will be as ineffective as, some critics believe, the position of director of national intelligence has been in coordinating data sharing and consensus among the 16 federal intelligence agencies.

McCaul proposed banning the manufacture of the malware that bad actors often purchase and use in cyberattacks, and he would offer industry tax credits and other incentives -- rather than more regulation from the Homeland Security Department -- to produce operating systems and software that are safer from outside penetration.

He predicted the current Senate cybersecurity bill Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., sponsored will not pass, in part because of privacy advocates' objections to its provision to give the president a "kill switch," which would allow him, in the case of a massive cyberattack on the United States, to shut down the Internet.

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Software vulnerability

Hundreds of Thousands of Job Seekers' Information May Have Been Compromised by Hackers

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.