recommended reading

Even in the Cloud, Japan and China Are at Odds


Shinzo Abe isn’t the only one stirring up Japanese-Chinese tensions.

Japan’s National Information Security Center has asked government ministries to wean themselves off foreign-made typing apps that make it easy to use English-language keyboard to input Japanese characters. These apps are made by Microsoft, Google, and China’s Baidu.

The NISC’s suggestion makes sense. If you are using a free cloud-based service, your data is not secure. This should be self-evident by now. It’s foolish for any government department to use insecure lines of communication for confidential documents. Companies such as China’s Huawei and Lenovo are looked upon with suspicion in the west and, after Edward Snowden’s revelations, American companies can hardly claim to be bathed in milk, either.

But in Japan, the reports shifted from sensible to scaremongering. The Asahi Shimbun newspaper, referring to Baidu, headlined its piece, “Free Chinese software secretly transmitting Japanese users’ data.”

Baidu’s app is used by some 2 million people (link in Japanese). It responded to a request for comment from Tech in Asia, a popular blog, explaining that of course the app connects to servers. It has to in order to work.

This manufactured scandal, which comes on the same day as China’s outrage ofShinzo Abe’s visit to a controversial war memorial, is similar to one about Facebook a couple of weeks ago. A widely-cited piece in Slate used a research paper from Facebook employees to makes the case that “Facebook still knows what you typed—even if you decide not to publish it.” A closer reading of the paper (pdf) would have shown that Facebook knows only that you typed, not what you typed. There is a big difference.

Messaging apps do the same thing. That’s how you know that the person at the other is typing something. Search engines do it, too. That’s how they offer suggestions or bring up instant results. This is the nature of the web. We may not all be comfortable with it, in which case it is perfectly legitimate to not use it. But to call it a conspiracy is silly—or opportunistic.

(Image via suns07butterfly/

Threatwatch Alert

Credential-stealing malware / User accounts compromised / Software vulnerability

Android Malware Infects More than 1M Phones, Adds 13,000 Devices a Day

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.