A proposal unveiled late Thursday by the Republican Study Committee includes many reforms that would impact the federal workforce, including one that would extend the current federal pay freeze from two years to five.
The plan -- the Spending Reduction Act of 2011 -- would cut the civil service by a total of 15 percent through attrition. The bill would allow the hiring of only one new worker for every two workers who leave the federal government until the 15 percent reduction target has been met.
The bill also would eliminate automatic pay increases for federal workers for the next five years and prohibit federal employees from serving as union officials on government time.
The news comes just days after the Partnership for Public Service released a report urging federal agencies to ramp up their retention programs and strategies in order to retain top-notch workers who may leave or retire due to the two-year pay freeze and other budget cuts. What impact would these new workforce cuts and a five-year pay freeze have on workers' willingness to stay in their jobs, particularly as the economy recovers? Would agencies be able to do enough to retain them?
Brittany Ballenstedt
Brittany Ballenstedt writes Nextgov's Wired Workplace blog, which delves into the issues facing employees who work in the federal information technology sector. Before joining Nextgov, Brittany covered federal pay and benefits issues as a staff correspondent for Government Executive and served as an associate editor for National Journal's Technology Daily. She holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from Mansfield University and originally hails from Pennsylvania. She currently lives near Travis Air Force Base, Calif., where her husband is stationed.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Nextgov does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.