Tom Fox of the Partnership for Public Service tackles the question of whether generational stereotypes are real in Monday's Federal Coach column. Fox argues that there may be real differences among the four generations in the federal workforce today, but conventional wisdom may not always be accurate. As a result, federal leaders should spend time asking questions and getting to know each member of the team in order to gain perspective on what motivates each employee, regardless of their generation. Leaders also should make sure they're looking for talent that matches the needs of today, rather than seeking traits that already exist, Fox advises.
"Thirty years ago government managers set out to find people willing to stay for 30 years. That was the norm," Fox writes. "Today, though, you're looking at a different population. People are looking to move around throughout their careers, and leaders need to make sure they are changing with the times."
Do generational stereotypes still govern some of the management practices in your office? Are the stereotypes useful? And do leaders at your agency look to hire employees with the talents of today or yesterday?
Brittany Ballenstedt
Brittany Ballenstedt writes Nextgov's Wired Workplace blog, which delves into the issues facing employees who work in the federal information technology sector. Before joining Nextgov, Brittany covered federal pay and benefits issues as a staff correspondent for Government Executive and served as an associate editor for National Journal's Technology Daily. She holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from Mansfield University and originally hails from Pennsylvania. She currently lives near Travis Air Force Base, Calif., where her husband is stationed.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Nextgov does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.