recommended reading

House Staffers Banned From Wikipedia Over Anti-Transgender Edits

"Orange is the New Black" actress Laverne Cox

"Orange is the New Black" actress Laverne Cox // Alexandra Wyman/Invision for Netflix/AP

A House staffer's edits to a number of Wikipedia entries on transgender people has caused an uproar in the LGBT community and, once again, resulted in Wikipedia banning a House IP address.

The staffer, who identifies as a "womyn" in comments on the site, edited the Wikipedia entry for transgender actress Laverne Cox of Orange Is the New Black earlier this month to describe her as "a real man pretending to be a woman." The staffer appears to work in the Rayburn House office building.

The staffer, via notes posted to Wikipedia, argues that she is being targeted in a "political witch hunt" by the "trans-lobby." "I don't see how disagreeing with the concept that transphobia is a negative thing is considered 'hate speech'. The whole concept of 'transphobia' is being promoted to trivialize the experiences of real women (or 'womyn-born-womyn' as some people call us)," the staffer wrote.

The staffer also complained of being labeled a "TERF," or "Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist," a term used to describe feminists who believe that trans women are not "real" women.

"These days, If I complain about a man using the womyn's restroom then I'm cosidered [sic] transphobic and get called a TERF. This has been happening a lot lately here in the halls of Congerss [sic]. If feeling uncomfortable about some creeper coming into the same bathroom as me is considered transphobic, then why is transphobia considered a bad thing?" the staffer wrote. "I wouldn't be surprised if the Admin who banned this IP is trans. If she is a real woman, then she should should be following real Feminists like Julie Bindel, not sellouts to the trans lobby like Anita Sarkeesian."

The same IP address has been linked to a number of other entries related to transgender individuals and issues have been edited with a similar mindset, leading Wikipedia editors to assume that they are coming from the same staffer. Those edits include an alteration of the Wikipedia entry for Camp Trans, an annual transgender protest outside of the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival which excludes trans people. The user added a line indicating that the event "was intended for real women," which has since been removed by moderators.

In comments to Wikipedia editors, the user also accused the European Union of "using neocolonialist methods to impose transgenderism on the nation of Georgia" and criticized some members of Congress, the majority of whom are Democrats, for supporting the Employee Non-Discrimination Act, which would provide work protections for LGBT individuals.

The comments were posted anonymously via an IP address that covers a number of House offices and could not be narrowed to a single staffer or congressional office. So the site, as it has done in the past, banned the entire IP address from editing Wikipedia entries for a month.

The Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT advocacy group, called the edits "deeply troubling." HRC is now calling on House Speaker John Boehner to investigate which indivdual (or potentially individuals) made the anonymous edits. "At a time when more and more Americans are recognizing and upholding the rights and dignity of transgender Americans, it is an unwelcome reminder of how much work remains to be done," HRC vice president Jeff Krehely said in a release.

The edits were first noted by CongressEdits, a Twitter account that automatically posts Wikipedia entry edits that are tied to congressional IP addresses. The account has become a major resouce for journalists and advocacy groups since it launched earlier this year.

Ars Technica notes this is the second time in a month that House users have been banned from editing Wikipedia.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

    View
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    View
  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

    View
  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

    View
  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

    View
  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

    View

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.