recommended reading

Congressional IP Address Blocked from Making Edits to Wikipedia

Gil C/

In light of a very curious Twitter account, @Congressedits — which tracks and posts all changes made to Wikipedia pages from within the U.S. Capitol — Wikipedia has banned anonymous edits to their pages from a certain congressional IP address. The IP address, which could be used by a number of different people, will be blocked for the next ten days.

There has naturally been speculation that the edits flagged by @Congressedits are being made by Congressional staffers. The Washington Post has described the edits as "trolling," and The Wire is inclined to agree. Some of the changes have been to things like the page about horse heads, after a citizen wearing a horse head mask shook President Obama's hand, and another accusing Cuba for spreading Apollo 11 conspiracy theories.

When the edits were covered by Mediaite, someone at this same IP address changed Mediaite's Wikipedia page to say the publication is "sexist transphobic." 

Apparently, this change to Mediate's page was the final straw for Wikipedia's administrators, leading to the IP address ban. Katherine Maher, chief communications officer for the Wikimedia Foundation, issued this statement:

The Wikimedia Foundation does not set editorial policy for Wikimedia projects, including English Wikipedia. Each project (such as English Wikipedia, German Wikipedia, etc.) has its own volunteer community, which collectively sets the editorial policies and guidelines for that project. The members of the community then work to uphold those policies and guidelines.
In this case, this decision was made by a member of the English Wikipedia community. According to the entry for Disruptive Editing, it is a "pattern of editing" that disrupts the process of "improving an article or building the encyclopedia."

This ten-day block is meant to serve as a warning, however, Wikipedia has already stated on their website, "Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block."

(Image via Gil C/

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.