recommended reading

Here Comes GSA's Next Governmentwide Telecom Contract Vehicle

hxdyl/Shutterstock.com

The General Services Administration’s information technology contracting office is seeking industry feedback on plans for the next governmentwide contract vehicle for telecommunications and related services.

GSA is in the process of developing Network Services 2020, or NS2020, a slate of approved vendors offering everything from basic telephone and data services to niche satellite and infrastructure contracts for federal agencies. The request for information posted Tuesday seeks industry feedback on how GSA should structure that global contracting vehicle.

GSA will begin soliciting bids in fiscal 2015 from vendors who want to be part of the NS2020 contract vehicle, according to the RFI. Contracts with the vendors approved under NS2020 will likely be available for 15 years or for 10 years with five option years, the RFI said.

NS2020 will replace Networx, a similar global contract vehicle for telecom services that’s set to expire soon, but will include a broader suite of services.

NS2020, Networx and other GSA contract vehicles work something like a menu of services. GSA vets and approves vendors to provide specific services, but those vendors must still compete for actual agency contracts.

Agencies’ transition to Networx from its predecessor contract vehicle FTS 2001 progressed slowly, resulting in lost savings of more than $300 million, according to a December 2013 Government Accountability Office report. GAO blamed the delays on overly complicated acquisition procedures and diminishing contracting expertise at agencies.

Whether NS2020 can be designed in such a way that it cuts down on that transition time will be vital to whether the program proves successful or not, said John Johnson, a partner with the consultant Deep Water Point and former assistant commissioner for GSA’s Integrated Technology Service, which managed Networx.

Johnson also suggested lowering the fees GSA receives from new agency contracts under the NS2020 vehicle. Those fees were typically 7 percent under Networx. That would reduce agencies’ transition costs and also give GSA an added incentive to find operational savings to make up for the diminished fees, Johnson said.

“Defining what is to be purchased isn’t the hard part,” he said. “The hard part is how you operate and maintain [NS2020] efficiently and effectively so the transitions aren’t so long. It’s not so much what you buy but how you buy and deliver it that’s going to make the difference.”

(Image via hxdyl/Shutterstock.com)

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.