recommended reading

Should Consumers Bear the Cost to Upgrade the Grid?

Perfect Gui/

Given that it will cost upward of $4 trillion over the next 20 years to modernize electricity, gas, and water lines, is it OK to allow utilities to tack on extra charges to customers' bills to pay for those upgrades? How can customers voice their opinions? The first question is one that utility regulators deal with on a daily basis. The second question is only just beginning to surface.

Every time a utility wants to add extra charges to utility bills for a system upgrade, a state public utility commission has to weigh whether the proposed upgrade is necessary and whether the company has done its due diligence in maintaining its current infrastructure. Then the commission has to consider whether the utility can or should pay for the upgrade without a surcharge. And, finally, it has to determine whether the amount of the proposed surcharge is too high. It's a long, detailed legal process that can take months (or years) to finish.

"There is no easy booklet that I can refer to as a regulator, like a flow chart that says, 'If this occurs, you give them their money. If this occurs, you do not give them their money,' " said Colette Honorable, the president of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners in a feature story on utility surcharges that recently ran in National Journal magazine.

Regulators are well aware that granting a utility's request for a surcharge can be a double-edged sword. It gives the utilities access to capital and cheaper financing, but it also puts an extra burden on consumers who are not responsible for maintaining reliable service. Still, pipelines and power lines don't last forever, and replacing them requires a massive investment that can't be recouped with basic charges for the use of a utility. Moreover, the United States is experiencing frequent severe-weather events that cause prolonged power outages at a time when people are more attached than ever to their devices.

The public, for the most part, isn't involved in the details of utility-rate setting. The entire system is out of sight and out of mind as long as the lights come on. Power outages are often the first time that customers turn their attention to a utility and its regulators. The lack of public attention at other times insulates the utilities, the regulators, and the consumer advocates who are supposed to be watching over them. That's not good for anyone.

Customers can get involved in utility-rate issues, but it requires a little more commitment than complaining to a consumer affairs department once or twice a year. All commission deliberations are available online for anyone to peruse. Local elected officials generally are in contact with regulators and utilities, and their involvement can spur public hearings and forums. The commissions often have their own hearings, and they are willing to accept testimony from the guy on the street as part of their case-setting record. (That's not a regular request, however.)

(Image via Perfect Gui/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.