recommended reading

Key Senators Back a Stronger, More Digital FOIA

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., left, accompanied by the committee's ranking Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., left, accompanied by the committee's ranking Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa. // Susan Walsh/AP

The ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee expressed interest on Tuesday in a House-passed bill to strengthen the Freedom of Information Act, including by mandating a single online portal for all government FOIA requests.

Judiciary committee staff members are reviewing the bill that the House passed unanimously in February, said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.

Grassley and Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., both expressed optimism the committee would take up transparency legislation during a hearing focused on “Reinvigorating FOIA for the Digital Age.”

The FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act would also require that the Office of Government Information Services, which was established in 2007 as something of a FOIA ombudsman, report directly to Congress rather than passing its reports and recommendations through the White House’s Office of Management and Budget first.

OGIS’ first slate of recommendations to improve governmentwide FOIA performance were stalled at OMB for more than a year before being released in April 2012 amid pressure from Leahy and Grassley.

Leahy asked OGIS Director Miriam Nisbet to weigh in on the House legislation, which was sponsored by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and ranking member Elijah Cummings, D-Md. She declined to comment because the Obama administration hasn’t stated an official position on the bill.

Nisbet praised FOIA Online, a pilot tool to receive and manage FOIA requests across a handful of agencies, including OGIS’s parent agency the National Archives and Records Administration.

“Whether in a small agency or a large one, the system seems to be working quite well,” she said. “We’ve got good feedback from requesters and we think this is a good model for looking at expanding it, which we hope happens, or to [inform the] next version that comes along.”

Grassley asked Nisbet whether the Treasury Department, which used FOIA Online for about one year before withdrawing, had exited because of problems with the system. Nisbet said Treasury was already developing an internal FOIA Web tool when it joined FOIA Online and had used the joint system on a temporary basis while that system was being built.

Much of the remainder of Tuesday’s hearing focused on agency’s FOIA performance, with several senators citing a Center for Effective Government scorecard that gave failing grades to seven of 15 agencies that handle roughly 95 percent of all FOIA requests.

Among other factors for the low scores, the center cited a rising number of exemptions agencies cited for returning redacted or incomplete documents.

Melanie Pustay, director of the Justice Department’s Office of Information Policy, said the rising exemption figure could be misleading because agencies were processing a larger volume of requests and more complex requests. That analysis was disputed by several FOIA advocates who argued exemptions are interpreted too broadly and pressed for a broader role for OGIS.

Pustay cited better technological processing as the best way to decrease FOIA backlogs and to reduce wait times for requesters.

“I am very hopeful that the more advanced, sophisticated technology tools that can actually help agencies search for records and duplicate records and sort records, all the things that many times are done manually, they can be automated to increase timeliness,” she said. “That, in turn, will allow agencies to get back to requesters in a faster way.”

This story has been updated to clarify the state of potential FOIA legislation in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.