recommended reading

Here’s How Google Search Will Change After a 3-Year Battle With European Regulators


It’s finally over. After three years of back and forth, the European Commission announced an agreement with Google Wednesday morning that will govern the placement of competitors’ ads on Google’s search services. The Commission opened an investigation in Nov. 2010 after Google’s rivals claimed the search engine demoted their sites in search results.   

Once the agreement becomes a legally binding, a bureaucratic process than involves getting the rival firms, including Microsoft, to withdraw their complaints, Google will have to prominently display the services of three rivals alongside its own products—but only for search results served in Europe.

Here’s a search for “gas grill” as it appears today. The images up top are ads placed by Google for its shopping search service:


Once Google makes the changes, it will have to show rivals’ ads (which they must pay for through an independently-overseen bidding process) with the same prominence as its own:


Which applies wherever and however the results and ads are served. This is how it will look on a mobile screen:


Similarly, this is how Google will promote rival services for business listings. Note the competitors at the very top:


The challenge of concluding this agreement is apparent in a set of images, taken from an internal Commission document, that show Google’s final proposal for new ad displays, late in 2013. Here’s what Google had in mind (pdf) then:


Rivals’ links were placed further down, and offered users the option to hide them.

On mobile, competitors didn’t show up until clicked (see the boxed text in the image to the left).


Like any good compromise, the final agreement leaves all parties dissatisfied. Google, which must abide by the rules for five years, was never thrilled at the idea of cluttering its results with links to other businesses, even if it doesn’t make any material difference to its bottom line. But it had little choice. Not making concessions would have meant protracted negotiations and legal challenges, and the possibility of a fine of up 10% of its revenue which for 2012, or about $5 billion.

Google’s rivals would have liked the Commission to go much further, perhaps even stopping Google from promoting its own businesses. This, too, is impractical. They have called the Commission’s decision not to seek their opinion before agreeing to the deal “a massive failure.” Indeed, the Commission is the only party that seems to have got what it wanted—a deal it can call a victory, even if it produces few tangible benefits for anybody.

(Image via antb /

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.