recommended reading

Analysis: Tech Companies Are Way Too Secretive for Their Own Good

Vincent Yu/AP

Tech companies have billions riding on the success of their products, so they have good reason to be secretive. But when it becomes a reflexive part of company culture, it can backfire.

Amazon makes a habit of disclosing only the numbers it’s obligated to, and it keeps a tight leash on employees. Discipline has served it well in the market, but as George Packer points out in the New Yorker, there are long term issues with adopting secrecy as a given:

“I would argue that a culture of secrecy is bound to end up harming the institution itself, especially when it’s firmly under the control of one leader, as Amazon is under Jeff Bezos. Without some permeability to the outside world, groupthink takes over, bad habits become entrenched, and a company, like a government, is slow to recognize problems that are apparent to everyone else.”

Secrecy also constrains a company’s talent and makes it more difficult to criticize and self-correct.

A recent Medium post from Jordan Price, an ex-Apple contractor who publicly quit, illustrates the way that tight controls can wear a worker down. Price points out that on-boarding was a nightmare due to an array of passwords, accounts, and logins—it took a month just to get on the company’s server. Constant meetings and checkins eroded productivity as well.

Apple notoriously has, CEO Tim Cook recently put it, ”black drapes and numerous locked doors and many other things.”

Barriers make it harder for people to get work done, and create a demoralizing divide between the limited number of employees in the know and everybody else. Talented people don’t generally relish the idea of working on tasks that seemingly have no relation to the finished product of a company. When locked rooms and secret projects are norm, people are likely to feel like they aren’t good or valued enough to be let in the secret.

As Duke professor Dorie Clark points out at the Harvard Business Review, employee buy-in is a better motivation tool than money. That’s hard to generate when information and strategy is hidden.

Companies whose proprietary research or product development takes years don’t have the luxury of being completely transparent. But they need to draw the line: when secrecy makes people worse, not better, employees.

This story is republished with permission from Quartz. The original version can be found here.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.