recommended reading

Federal Technology Performance Info Should Be Public All the Time, GAO Says


A government auditor called on the White House on Monday to end its practice of freezing the main outlet for public information about federal technology performance during budget reviews.

That practice has resulted in the IT Dashboard not being updated for 15 of the past 24 months, the Government Accountability Office said, making it extremely difficult for watchdogs and others to effectively review government performance on technology issues.

Information currently posted to the dashboard dates back more than four months to Aug. 30, 2012. At that point, as an example, the Obama administration’s troubled online health insurance marketplace had not yet launched publicly and had a 3 out of 5 rating, which equates to “moderate risk.”

Agencies are required to post information about their most expensive information technology investments on the dashboard, including cost and scheduling information and the agency chief information officer’s assessment of the project's risk of going over budget or past deadline.

GAO independently reviewed 80 investments on the IT Dashboard, including 10 each from eight agencies. The office found that 53 agency ratings were consistent with GAO’s own evaluation based on the agencies’ supporting documents, while 20 were partially consistent and seven were inconsistent.

Ratings were often inconsistent because of delays in updating the dashboard rather than genuine disagreements about the level of risk associated with the investments, GAO said.

All of the inconsistent investments were at the Veterans Affairs Department. The risk ratings for those investments were never updated during the period of GAO’s review, the office said, largely because VA opted to build a system to automatically update the dashboard rather than buying commercial technology to perform that task. VA has now resumed updating the dashboard, GAO said. 

(Image via solarseven/

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.