recommended reading

Congress Cracks Down on Purchases of Chinese-Made IT

Arkadiusz Komski/

Legislation expected to pass both the House and Senate by late this week bars several departments from buying Chinese-manufactured computer equipment until federal authorities conduct special inspections. The stipulation faces opposition from some unlikely corners though: U.S. businesses allegedly hacked by China have said the move will probably slow acquisitions and hurt American multinational companies.

The provision, included in a fiscal 2014 spending package up for a House vote today, is a reaction to China's alleged gross theft of U.S. trade secrets and classified intelligence. Lawmakers folded a similar policy into fiscal 2013 funding legislation. 

The measure directs the departments of Commerce and Justice, NASA and the National Science Foundation to screen for “any risk of cyber-espionage or sabotage” in computer systems "produced, manufactured, or assembled" by entities "that may be owned, directed, or subsidized by the People’s Republic of China." 

Last spring, industry associations argued that discrimination against China could encourage retaliation, and the mandatory audits could delay installation of new federal security systems.

"The requirement to assess every IT product purchase, absent any triggering threshold, will likely slow the federal acquisition process and put impacted federal agencies behind the security innovation curve because they would not be acquiring and using the latest security innovations," the technology organizations wrote in a letter to lawmakers. Cosigners included the Chamber of Commerce, whose own data reportedly was compromised by Chinese hackers in 2011. 

Another somewhat protectionist stipulation in the 2014 measure essentially outlaws military supercomputers developed anywhere outside the United States. The Pentagon cannot purchase a foreign-built machine without certifying to Congress that capable U.S.-made systems are not available, according to the legislation. 

A recently-enacted defense authorization bill directs the Energy Department to create “exascale” supercomputers for simulating nuclear weapons explosions. The machines would run at a speed of a quintillion operations per second. That is 1,000 times faster than the pace of the present record holder, a supercomputer developed by China’s National University of Defense Technology that can perform 34 quadrillion calculations per second.

(Image via Arkadiusz Komski/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.