recommended reading

Is It Time for a Secretary of Technology?

Kristoffer Tripplaar

Want to prevent the next debacle? Look to the British, says Clay Johnson, a former government innovation fellow and outspoken critic of the troubled online insurance marketplace.

To improve accountability for government information technology projects, Johnson suggested implementing something like the United Kingdom’s Government Digital Service, a Cabinet-level agency that oversees technology spending across the British government and reports directly to the Prime Minister.

Johnson was speaking at Nextgov’s two-day technology conference Nextgov Prime.

The British model, which builds most of the government’s non-commodity IT in-house, probably wouldn’t work for a government the size of the U.S., Johnson told Nextgov in a sideline interview.

Instead, Johnson suggested a 50-person office with a Cabinet-level leader that would oversee a simplified procurement process with external contractors. In addition to providing more oversight for government IT projects that would also enforce more accountability, Johnson said, because a single official -- the secretary -- would be responsible for any contracting disaster.

The office should include about 30 software developers, 10 liaisons to other federal agencies and 10 administrators, Johnson said. Running the office would cost about $20 million per year, he said, including higher-than-average federal salaries to attract top talent.

“If we can spend [$20 million] to make sure we never have a $630 million fiasco again, why not do it?” he asked, citing a common figure for the contract.

During Johnsons’s work as a presidential innovation fellow, he helped build RFP-EZ, a simplified contracting site for small technology projects that, in a trial run, brought in bids about 30 percent lower than the same bids on the standard contracting site FedBizOpps.

Johnson also suggested raising the threshold for a simplified acquisition, which requires much less work on the part of contractors and federal contracting officers, from $125,000 to $500,000.

“That’s about enough money for a company with a developer, a designer, a project manager and a CEO to build a federal website for a year and make a healthy profit,” he said.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.