recommended reading

Government Performance Site Failed to Follow Its Own Advice

A government website designed to track whether agencies are making the best use of their resources has failed to follow some best practices of its own, an auditor said Thursday.

A 2010 law directed the government to make agency performance information readily available to Congress and the public through a single website. The officials running have only gathered limited feedback from regular visitors since the site’s launch, though, and don’t offer enough information about how the site ought to be used, the Government Accountability Office said.

“While [the White House’s Office of Management and Budget] collected input from some congressional staff, government transparency organizations, and performance experts, the limited outreach to a broader set of potential audiences and the lack of usability testing to date means that OMB does not know whether meets users needs or how the website could be further developed,” GAO said.

“Not tracking all recommended performance metrics, particularly those measuring user satisfaction or establishing appropriate goals for certain metrics, may also make it more difficult to analyze the effectiveness of the website and to identify and prioritize potential improvements,” the office continued.

OMB agreed with GAO’s criticisms and plans to conduct its first usability tests in September, GAO said. fell short of many requirements described in its authorizing legislation, the Government Performance and Results Modernization Act, when it was first launched in mid-2011. Officials attributed the shortcomings, including a nearly nonexistent search function, to a 75 percent cut in the e-government fund, which pays for digital transparency initiatives.

The White House agreed to the e-gov cut as part of a last-minute deal with House Republicans in April of that year to avoid a government shutdown. had improved dramatically by an October 2012 deadline but still was not fully compliant with the law’s requirements. 

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.