recommended reading

Commerce Seeks Unified Customer Management System


The Commerce Department is considering purchasing a single, cloud-based customer relations management system that it can use across its 12 agencies, solicitation documents show.

The unified system would replace a hodgepodge of existing software tools that manage and track Commerce agencies’ marketing campaigns, surveys and Web and social media communications with citizens, according to the documents posted in May.

The existing systems are a mix of commercial products, custom-built systems and software-as-a-service options, meaning the systems are managed and maintained by external contractors.

A departmentwide system will help Commerce operate more efficiently and save money through economies of scale, the department said. The move was also prompted by White House mandates to ramp up shared services within departments and agencies and to move as much government computing as possible to computer clouds, which can store information and systems more cheaply than on-site data centers.

The solicitation document did not include an estimate of likely savings from the unified system. The document was a request for information, which means the government is surveying possible vendors and hasn’t committed to buying anything. If the department does issue a request for quotation, work will likely begin on the project in 2014, Commerce said.

The winning system will serve roughly 6,000 Commerce employees who must be able to access it through computers, smartphones and tablets, the department said. The system may be placed inside a public or hybrid cloud, which means it will have slightly looser security requirements and share cloud space with private sector systems, according to a question-and-answer document attached to the RFI.

The proposed system will face challenges, including “multiple ‘stovepipe’ systems that require [Commerce] staff to access and manually organize relevant information from several different systems when interacting with customers,” the department said. 

(Image via nobeastsofierce/

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.