recommended reading

Getting the prize purse right in tech contests is a challenge all its own


What’s the toughest part about putting together a government-sponsored prize competition to develop new and innovative technologies?

It’s not finding problems in need of a solution or drawing in competitors, according to Gregory Downing, executive director for innovation at the Health and Human Services Department.

The toughest part is determining how much the prize purse should be, Downing said in a presentation Friday before the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology. HHS has launched or cooperated in more than a dozen challenges since 2010.

In a conventional government solicitation, an agency precisely details the technology it is seeking and then determines which vendor offered the best combination of expertise, assets and low price. The agency wouldn’t have to worry about the cost itself until plenty of offers were on the table.

In a prize competition, however, an agency must decide how much to spend as it’s putting together the specifications for the technology it’s seeking.

One major upside of such challenges is the group offering the prize, whether it’s a government agency, a foundation or a private company, often can count on competitors investing more money than the offeror is actually paying out, said Cristin Dorgelo, assistant director for grand challenges in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. That usually leads to more new technology and innovative ideas than a traditional solicitation.

NASA’s Green Flight Challenge, which was sponsored by Google and aimed at developing more fuel-efficient aircrafts, doled out $1.65 million to prize winners, Dorgelo said, but the 14 competing teams together invested $6 million.

Competitors also typically take various approaches to a technical or scientific problem, allowing the offering agency to cheaply determine which ones work best, Dorgelo said. They can sometimes point out new ideas entirely, she said.

“One researcher at an agency I won’t name put up a competition and said in the six weeks [during which competitors submitted] ideas to try to solve the problem he put forward, he saw all the approaches that he had considered in his 30 years of research on that problem,” she said. “So imagine having gotten that landscape survey at the beginning of those 30 years, where he could have gone.”

Since its launch two years ago, the government’s competition platform has hosted 200 competitions from 45 departments and agencies that have drawn in 16,000 “citizen solvers,” according to a White House blog post.

Agencies were given greater authority to spend money on prize competitions by the 2010 America Competes Act. Some agencies, including NASA, began offering challenges long before came online through external sites such as Innocentive.

A study of private sector prize competitions showed that winners typically were from a different discipline than those who would have tackled the problem through a conventional contract, Karim Lakhani, a Harvard Business School professor and expert in prize competitions told PCAST members. The study also showed that women, if they enter competitions, are more likely to win than men, he said.

(Image via Chatchawan/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.