recommended reading

Feds work one month less per year than private sector peers, study shows

Helder Almeida/

There have been several studies that claim federal employees are paid higher salaries than those in the private sector. Now, a new study by the Heritage Foundation claims that not only are feds overpaid, they work fewer hours – approximately one whole month less per year on average – than their private sector peers.

The study, released Tuesday, found that federal workers work an average of 38.7 hours per week, roughly three hours less than the private sector average of 41.4 hours. That means that in one work year, federal employees work about 153 hours less -- approximately one month less – than their private sector counterparts, Heritage found.

The data is based on the American Time Use Survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2003 to 2010. Heritage determined the 40-hour workweek by dividing total annual work hours by 40, accounting for factors like vacation and sick leave.

“The ‘underworked’ government employee should be of concern to taxpayers who expect private sector levels of work in the public sector in exchange for private sector levels of compensation,” the report states. “With several recent studies suggesting an overall compensation premium for public employees, reducing aspects of that premium -- such as paid leave -- could be part of a larger strategy to shrink the pay gap and save taxpayer money.”

In the age of mobile devices and more flexibility to work outside of the office, it seems many federal workers are putting in more hours than they have in the past. IT workers in particular appear to be solving problems after-hours or on their own time.

Is the Heritage study a fair assessment of your work? How do you think your work hours would compare in a similar private sector IT job?

(Image via Helder Almeida/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.