recommended reading

Top FDA officials were privy to surveillance of employee emails


Senior officials at the Food and Drug Administration knew the agency was monitoring emails of scientists who had leaked concerns about faulty medical devices being greenlit, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing officials and a document sent to Senate investigators.

The monitoring of emails began in the spring of 2010, after media leaks on supposedly proprietary information about companies' medical devices. The agency used spy software that logged keystrokes, intercepted personal emails, and tracked messages as they were drafted in real time, according to a New York Times investigative report.

Jeffrey Shuren, director of the FDA's medical-device center, had asked his No. 2 official in the device center, Ruth McKee, to look into what could be done to stop the leaks, according to the Journal report.  Lori Davis, then-chief information officer of the agency, requested the surveillance of five scientists who ultimately were monitored. The scientists were among a group of nine whistleblowers who complained to then-President-elect Barack Obama's transition team in early 2009 that safety issues were being neglected at the agency.

The scientists filed lawsuits against the FDA. In recent weeks, an FDA team led by John M. Taylor III, counselor to Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, has opened an internal investigation to find out how the monitoring program was allowed, according to the Journal. Hamburg knew about the monitoring of emails of scientists, the report said.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.