recommended reading

Romney campaign press call gives Twitter grist to Democrats

Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

The perils of holding a campaign conference call in the Twitter age were on vivid display on Wednesday when bad reviews of a Mitt Romney campaign call starting flooding Twitter in real time.
Both the Romney and Obama campaigns hold myriad conference calls to promote their message du jour.  But Romney aides got more than they bargained for this time.
The topic of the call was supposed to be—shockingly—“President Obama’s Continuing Record of Failure on the Economy,” featuring standard Obama-bashing by Romney policy director Lanhee Chen and Staples founder Tom Stemberg.
But all the reporters really wanted to do was talk immigration.
That should not have come as a surprise. The topic has been all the buzz since Obama’s announcement on Friday that his administration would halt deportations of some illegal immigrants who were brought to the United States as children, and Romney refused to say if he supports the policy. The subject gathered more steam on Tuesday when Romney had to deny reports that Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the most prominent Hispanic politician in the GOP, was not being vetted as a potential running mate.
Miffed Romney aides repeatedly urged participants in Wednesday’s call to keep their questions “on topic.” They ended it abruptly after uncooperative reporters asked three immigration-related questions in succession.
“Gov. Romney is speaking at NALEO tomorrow and will have a few more things there to say about immigration," Chen said, referring to the annual conference of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials in Orlando, Fla. 
The call was chronicled on Twitter as it happened, giving the Obama campaign an opening to compile the less-than-flattering 140-character accounts (“awkward” call, "abruptly" disconnected) into a press release.
“So that call was a monumental waste of time,” Zeke Miller of BuzzFeed tweeted. Ben Jacobs of The Daily Beast responded, tongue in cheek, “The call wasn't about time, it was about the economy. Please stay on-topic.”

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.