recommended reading

Air Force lets 12 small businesses in on network hardware deal


The Air Force late last week announced that it had awarded 12 small businesses the chance to compete for $960 million in task orders under a computer network hardware contract. The service also is accepting new bids this week from companies that this spring protested the results of the $6.9 billion portion of the contract that was open to firms of all sizes.

The Air Force Network-Centric Solutions-2 contract will provide the service with hardware building blocks for its wired and wireless networks during the next decade, including switches, hubs, gateways, routers, firewalls, servers, tape drives, satellite terminals, microwave and Wi-Fi hardware, and land mobile radios.

The contract also will cover biometric systems for identity management, such as Common Access Card readers, and fingerprint, iris and facial recognition technology.

Small businesses that won spots to compete for task orders on the indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity NETCENTS-2 contract are: ActioNet Inc., Array Information Technology Inc., Datum Software Inc., Digital Management Inc., Diligent Consulting Inc., Diversified Technical Services Inc., DSD Laboratories Inc., Excellus Solutions LLC, Exeter Government Services LLC, IndraSoft, Segue Technologies and SI Systems Technologies.

The Air Force on April 17 awarded the full and open NETCENTS-2 hardware contract to Ace Technology Partners LLC, Blue Tech Inc., FedStore Corp., General Dynamics Information Technology, Global Technology Resources Inc., GTSI Corp., Iron Bow Technologies LLC, M2 Technology Inc. and Red River Computer Co.

In late April and early May, 18 companies filed protests against those awards with the Government Accountability Office.

Francine Nix, NETCENTS-2 contracting officer at Maxwell Air Force Base-Gunter Annex in Montgomery, Ala., on May 31 sent a memo to all bidders in the full and open competition, saying that after vendor debriefings, “it became apparent that offerors may have inconsistently interpreted the requirements of the [request for proposals] as it related to completing contractual documentation and -- in some aspects -- the technical and price requirements.”

Nix said to “ensure fairness to all offerors” the Air Force would allow all bidders in the competitive range to submit revised proposals. On June 21, she sent another memo to vendors stating the Air Force expected to ask for final proposal revisions Monday, with bids due Wednesday.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.