recommended reading

Google Scrubs BBC Article Because Someone Wanted It 'Forgotten'

BBC's news operation is headquartered in London.

BBC's news operation is headquartered in London. // mikecphoto/

BBC economics editor Robert Peston woke up to a surprising email from Google this morning. Google had stripped a blog post he wrote seven years ago from their European search results, complying with new measures that require sites to honor the "right to be forgotten" online. 

Here's what Google sent Peston: 

Notice of removal from Google Search: we regret to inform you that we are no longer able to show the following pages from your website in response to certain searches on European versions of Google:

The post was removed because someone who was discussed in it asked Google to "forget" them. In the original article, Peston only named one particular individual, Stan O'Neal, a former executive at Merrill Lynch. That narrows down who put in the request to Google with great ease.

Peston describes his post as a discussion of "how O'Neal was forced out of Merrill after the investment bank suffered colossal losses on reckless investments it had made." The post did not outwardly attack O'Neal, nor was it "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant," which are the requirements set for being "forgotten." 

This plays directly into fears that Google would allow illegitimate requests to slip through the cracks, "forgetting" search results that remain relevant, and undermining the freedom of journalism. Google's "forgetting" process is still in its infancy, since the court ruling that created this situation is less than two months old. While they have hired "an army of paralegals," they are receiving thousands of requests, which even an army would have a difficult time processing perfectly. Peston plans to appeal his forgotten blog post. Google has not yet responded to his appeal.

(Image via mikecphoto /

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.