recommended reading

Europe Will Let Its Citizens Edit Google Search Results for Their Names

Mark Lennihan/AP

Google and other search engines routinely field takedown requests to remove material from results that violates copyright, defamation, and other laws. But a ruling today (pdf) by the European Union’s highest court will now require them to consider takedown requests for material that is merely embarrassing or inconvenient, rather than illegal.

The European Court of Justice said Google must remove links in search results when requested by individuals, such as the Spanish man who brought a case against the search engine in order to remove links to a 1998 newspaper article about the sale of property to settle his debts. The court said that the “initially lawful processing of accurate data” could, over time, become “inadequate,” “irrelevant,” or “excessive” in the eyes of the people who feature in the material.

Today’s ruling significantly expands the scope of internet companies’ responsibility for what appears in search results. It also raises questions about how it will apply in practice—if a big portion of the EU’s 500 million residents ask to remove search results, the work will quickly add up—and whether the requirements will affect the availability of information in countries outside the EU. The ruling does not address either point directly.

Instead of a mere conduit for information, Google and its ilk should be considered “controllers” of personal data, the court said. The Spanish newspaper notice that brought about the case can still be found offline, as can all manner of property records, criminal histories, and other official documents for people determined to dig them up. But the ease with which such material can now be found on the web with just a few clicks has driven privacy advocates to push for greater control of how personal data is displayed on the web

“Data belongs to the individual, not to the company,” said European commissioner Viviane Reding, hailing today’s court ruling. “Unless there is a good reason to retain this data, an individual should be empowered—by law—to request erasure of this data.” Google called the judgment “disappointing,” and said it would “take time to analyze the implications.” EU countries have clashed in the recent past over the so-called “right to be forgotten,” with the UK particularly concerned about thepracticality and cost of enforcing the regime introduced by the court today.

Reprinted with permission from Quartz. The original story can be found here

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.