recommended reading

Europe Will Let Its Citizens Edit Google Search Results for Their Names

Mark Lennihan/AP

Google and other search engines routinely field takedown requests to remove material from results that violates copyright, defamation, and other laws. But a ruling today (pdf) by the European Union’s highest court will now require them to consider takedown requests for material that is merely embarrassing or inconvenient, rather than illegal.

The European Court of Justice said Google must remove links in search results when requested by individuals, such as the Spanish man who brought a case against the search engine in order to remove links to a 1998 newspaper article about the sale of property to settle his debts. The court said that the “initially lawful processing of accurate data” could, over time, become “inadequate,” “irrelevant,” or “excessive” in the eyes of the people who feature in the material.

Today’s ruling significantly expands the scope of internet companies’ responsibility for what appears in search results. It also raises questions about how it will apply in practice—if a big portion of the EU’s 500 million residents ask to remove search results, the work will quickly add up—and whether the requirements will affect the availability of information in countries outside the EU. The ruling does not address either point directly.

Instead of a mere conduit for information, Google and its ilk should be considered “controllers” of personal data, the court said. The Spanish newspaper notice that brought about the case can still be found offline, as can all manner of property records, criminal histories, and other official documents for people determined to dig them up. But the ease with which such material can now be found on the web with just a few clicks has driven privacy advocates to push for greater control of how personal data is displayed on the web

“Data belongs to the individual, not to the company,” said European commissioner Viviane Reding, hailing today’s court ruling. “Unless there is a good reason to retain this data, an individual should be empowered—by law—to request erasure of this data.” Google called the judgment “disappointing,” and said it would “take time to analyze the implications.” EU countries have clashed in the recent past over the so-called “right to be forgotten,” with the UK particularly concerned about thepracticality and cost of enforcing the regime introduced by the court today.

Reprinted with permission from Quartz. The original story can be found here

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.