recommended reading

OPM seeks to clarify national security roles

The Office of Personnel Management has proposed expanding the definition of jobs that are considered national security positions.

In the proposed rule, published in Tuesday's Federal Register, OPM says the change is part of its effort to simplify and streamline federal investigative and adjudicative processes to make them more efficient.

The proposed rule would clarify, not change, the standard agencies follow to designate national security positions. Under current guidelines, a national security job in any department or agency is held by an individual who "could bring about, by virtue of the nature of the position, a material adverse effect on the national security," whether or not the position requires access to classified information.

OPM notes that federal employees who don't have access to classified information, such as those who protect borders, ports and critical infrastructure, as well as those in positions related to protection of government information systems, could still potentially exert a material adverse effect on national security.

"OPM therefore proposes to update the definition of 'national security position' to add positions where the duties include 'protecting the nation, its citizens and residents from acts of terrorism, espionage, or foreign aggression,'" the proposed rule states.

Among the positions OPM suggests adding are those employees who protect or control access to facilities or information systems; those who control, maintain custody, safeguard or dispose of hazardous materials, arms, ammunition or explosives; and those who perform criminal justice, public safety or law enforcement duties.

OPM cautions that not all positions with those responsibilities will be reclassified. "In each instance, agencies must make a determination of whether the occupant's neglect, action or inaction could bring about a material adverse effect on the national security, i.e., could cause at least 'significant or serious damage to the national security.'"

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.