recommended reading

GSA pushes back Networx deadlines

The General Services Administration has extended two intermediate deadlines for agencies switching to the Networx telecommunications contract, but an observer said it remains unlikely that they will finish the move by June 2011, when services under the previous arrangement will expire.

GSA is giving agencies until August 2010 to pick a Networx vendor and begin changing services, said Karl Krumbholz, director of the network services program at GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Originally they had until January 2010 to request funding and until April 2010 to submit their orders. The extension comes in response to a request from the Interagency Management Council steering committee, chaired by Interior Department Chief Information Officer Sonny Bhagowalia.

According to Krumbholz, only 33 percent of services have been disconnected from FTS 2001, the less complicated contract that preceded Networx.

"Where we are now in the transition suggests that we're not going to make those milestones," he said. He declined to predict how likely it was agencies would complete the move by June 2011, but he was more pessimistic than three months ago.

"I'm hoping it will be done, there's a lot of work to be done yet," Krumbholz said. "Our goal is to get it done by 2011, that's when the contracts expire. Those are the facts."

Moving the intermediate milestones won't make much of a difference in completing the transition before FTS 2001 expires, said Bob Woods, president of Tyson's Corner, Va., Topside Consulting Group and former commissioner of GSA's now-defunct Federal Technology Service.

"The best they're going to get is 60 percent to 65 percent cut over by [June 2011]," he said. "I'm not wishing they'll miss it, I hope they don't. But hope is not a plan. That date seems awfully ambitious."

Woods attributed the delays to the complexity of Networx, which has forced agencies to evaluate their telecommunications needs. There is no easy one-to-one transition for many services as there was from FTS 2000 to FTS 2001. He said the shrinking of the federal telecom workforce and a lack of leadership from GSA also contributed to the problem.

"GSA has been too reticent about how they've treated this thing," Woods said. "Their view initially was that the contracts are out there, the transitions are up to you. You know when the deadlines are." GSA has shown improvement recently, he said, particularly under the leadership of Ed O'Hare, head of the Integrated Technology Service.

Krumbholz noted agencies are making 383 fair opportunity decisions, far more than originally anticipated. GSA expected agencies to choose one carrier for the bulk of their Networx services, but most have decided to hold competitions for individual services instead. Agencies have made only half of the fair opportunity decisions and 38 percent of the total statements of work have yet to reach GSA.

Delays in moving to Networx are costing the government $18 million a month, since the new contract is significantly cheaper than its predecessor. Moreover, any extension of FTS 2001 would involve sole-source contracts, which the Obama administration has said it wants to avoid.

Officials are growing more aware of the transition's importance thanks to O'Hare's leadership and the influence of the Chief Information Officers Council, which has been briefed and is "very aware and inclined to get this done," Krumbholz said.

"I think their heart's in it," Woods said. "But I think June 2011 will be very difficult to make."

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.