recommended reading

Some Things Should Be Banned from the Internet of Things

The console of the LG's Smart Refrigerator has menus for "food management."

The console of the LG's Smart Refrigerator has menus for "food management." // Flickr user davidberkowitz

The unknown danger in connecting an increasing number of analog objects, such as light bulbs, to the Web is worrying policy advisers.

The "Internet of Things” just might have too many things, says Richard Danzig, a member of the Defense Policy Board and the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board. 

"Information companies are maintaining connectivity and have built-in mechanisms for patching, however inadequate -- now what we have, in the Internet of Things, are lots of companies making refrigerators" or other objects "that are not information companies,” he said. “And the effect is that we are much more vulnerable."

Danzig, a former Navy secretary, was speaking with other cyber experts about his new Center for a New American Security report on containing national security threats in an increasingly wired world. 

For key systems, the paper recommends sacrificing some Internet benefits to ensure security. "Methods for pursuing this strategy include stripping down systems so they do less but have fewer vulnerabilities, integrating humans and other out-of-band (i.e., non-cyber) factors so the nation is not solely dependent on digital systems," as well as "making investments for graceful degradation,” Danzig writes.

Others in attendance agreed some industries perhaps should go on an IT diet. 

Some sectors "should not be connecting up and putting all things on the Internet -- period," said Melissa Hathaway, former acting senior director for cyberspace at the National Security Council and leader of the first Obama administration's landmark 60-day security review. 

That argument resonated with some Pentagon officials who are working on next-generation cyber protections.

Mike Walker, a program manager at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, does not set government policies but backs the idea of giving up some of the advantages of connectivity and automation in cases where the dangers are not yet understood.

Before joining DARPA, Walker consulted with companies on security holes in their systems and recalls "having this feeling of unease when I would go on one of these assessments to the energy sector or financial sector,” he told Nextgov, after the event.  

But in a society where people control their lives with the swipe of a finger, Gary McGraw, chief technology officer for software security firm Cigital, questioned the practicality of cutting back on connectivity.

"So close Pandora's Box? Put the cat back in the bag?" he said.

While uber-interconnectedness could become a consumer problem, it also might not necessarily imperil national security, Danzig said. 

"When somebody's medical record can be distorted or insulin pump can be tampered with -- that is a societal problem," he said. "But from a national security perspective, does it amount to something that could subvert the will of this country to achieve its ends? My guess is no. So as a national security type, I'm a little less worried about it in civilian applications."

Earlier this month, researchers at Context Information Security detailed how anyone near a popular Wi-Fi-connected light bulb could then crack that network's password.

The experiment used LIFX LED light bulbs controlled remotely using smartphones, offering energy savings and ambiance to homeowners and retailers.

But security vulnerabilities provided "knowledge of the encryption algorithm, key, initialization vector and an understanding of the mesh network" that the researchers used to "capture the Wi-Fi details and decrypt the credentials,” a company blog post states. 

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Spear-phishing

Researchers: Bank-Targeting Malware Sales Rise in Dark Web Markets

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.