recommended reading

Who's Going to Blink First on Cyber — Obama, or the House?

White House

The Obama administration will now have to weigh in sooner rather than later on a highly contentious cybersecurity bill moving through the House.

With two days to go, a public plea for Obama to stop the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, has crossed the 100,000-signature threshold required for an official response. Critics of the bill -- which is meant to facilitate the sharing of cyber information between the public and private sectors -- believe its definitions are far too broad. Vast amounts of user information could fall into the category of “cyber threat information” and wind up in the wrong hands, the legislation’s opponents have argued.

Companies and some policymakers have insisted that businesses have to be able to share information with each other and with the government for cyberspace to be defended effectively. Such a system would raise the bar for hackers so that only “a very persistent nation-state actor” could break into U.S. networks, said former CIA director Michael Hayden.

In a previous showdown over CISPA last year, the White House sided with the protesters by issuing a veto threat on the bill. The House reintroduced CISPA this year with no changes in the language, so the White House likely still has objections to it. That puts the House on a collision course with Obama. Either he will have to give up the veto threat, or the bill will have to be modified somehow before it reaches his desk.

Here’s the silver lining for Obama: Even if CISPA passes the House this spring, as it did last year, it would still have to be reconciled with whatever the Senate comes up with on cyber legislation. There’s no bill to look at yet in that chamber -- and there’s no expected timeline for one, as Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a member of the homeland security committee, told reporters recently.

But that doesn’t really help Obama right now. The anti-CISPA petition awaits.

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Spear-phishing

Researchers: Bank-Targeting Malware Sales Rise in Dark Web Markets

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.