recommended reading

Defense cyber chief downplays need to resolve lines of authority

A senior Pentagon official Wednesday downplayed the need to define clear lines of authority for federal agencies involved in combating cybersecurity threats, saying the emphasis has shifted toward having agencies work more closely together.

The Obama administration has ramped up efforts aimed at getting agencies to better coordinate their cybersecurity activities, even though questions persist over each agency's role and responsibilities and what authority they should have to defend computer and other information technology networks.

"People get focused on the authorities. In spite of the authorities, we've got problems," said Robert Butler, who left Computer Sciences Corp. last year to become the deputy assistant Defense secretary in charge of cyber policy.

During a breakfast with reporters, Butler said the administration has been shifting its focus toward determining what it wants agencies to accomplish, rather than first defining the lines of authority.

Just last week, for example, the Defense and Homeland Security departments announced an agreement under which they will share resources and colocate personnel at the secretive National Security Agency.

The agreement "was another step on our journey to a partnership with DHS," Butler said, adding that it "sets up an opportunity for DHS to take advantage of" DoD technical expertise.

"DoD's focus is really about getting into the mix," he said. "We want to get into the game with DHS and begin to practice this."

Butler acknowledged that much work remains to define operational roles and responsibilities of both agencies. For now, he said, a major goal is improving "situational awareness," or the ability to know when networks are under attack and, when possible, where an attack is coming from.

He said protecting privately owned critical infrastructure networks, such those of electrical companies and financial institutions, is "clearly" the responsibility of DHS. But he did not rule out a role for DoD in protecting those networks. DHS could request assistance from the Pentagon if needed, he said.

But Butler said determining the origin of an attack, commonly referred to as attribution, is still a major problem. And the administration is "grappling" with how to measure the seriousness and intention of an attack, he added.

Butler also said officials are considering the idea of creating a secure network that could shield government and privately owned networks from attacks. Army Gen. Keith Alexander, who is both NSA director and head of the newly created U.S. Cyber Command, has put forward the concept of a secure zone, which has been dubbed "dot-secure."

"That is one idea in a series of operating concepts," Butler said.

Threatwatch Alert

Stolen credentials

Hackers Steal $31M from Russian Central Bank

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.