<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:nb="https://www.newsbreak.com/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Nextgov/FCW - Authors - Dashiell Bennett</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/voices/dashiell-bennett/6713/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://www.nextgov.com/rss/voices/dashiell-bennett/6713/" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:13:28 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The CIA Didn't Trust Snowden, Even Back in 2009</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2013/10/cia-didnt-trust-snowden-even-back-2009/71810/</link><description>Edward Snowden had a negative report placed in his CIA personnel file, but that red flag didn't keep him out of NSA's highly classified computer network.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:13:28 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2013/10/cia-didnt-trust-snowden-even-back-2009/71810/</guid><category>Cybersecurity</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Edward Snowden had a negative report placed in his CIA personnel file more than four years ago, but that red flag wasn&amp;#39;t enough to keep him out of the NSA&amp;#39;s highly classified computer network. According&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/cia-warning-on-snowden-in-09-said-to-slip-through-the-cracks.html?hp&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;to a report in Friday&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt;,&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;while working as a CIA technician back in 2009,&amp;nbsp;Snowden was sent home from an overseas posting due to the suspicions of supervisor &amp;mdash; who suspected him of trying to gain unauthorized access to classified files. Yet, that didn&amp;#39;t stop Snowden from retaining his security clearance when he switched jobs and moved to the NSA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	At the beginning of 2013, Snowden was hired by Booz Allen Hamilton, a government contractor who put him to work for the National Security Agency. Had Booz Allen or the NSA seen Snowden&amp;#39;s CIA file before hiring him, it almost certainly would have affected his employment, but his tarnished record appears to have &amp;quot;slipped through the cracks.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	In 2006, Snowden was hired as computer technician by the CIA and sent to Geneva, Switzerland, with a State Department cover story. In interviews this summer, Snowden claimed his work in Geneva made him &amp;quot;disillusioned&amp;quot; with the government and its clandestine operations. By 2009, a supervisor noticed that Snowden&amp;#39;s attitude and work habits had changed. He placed a &amp;quot;derogatory report&amp;quot; in Snowden&amp;#39;s file, which included the suspicion that he had tried to access files without authorization. After the note was filed, Snowden was sent home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/10/cia-didnt-trust-snowden-even-back-2009/70436/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read the full story on&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;Atlantic Wire.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Navy Yard Responders Say Rescue Was Hampered by Bad Radios</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/09/navy-yard-responders-say-rescue-was-hampered-bad-radios/70616/</link><description>Radios reportedly weren't powerful enough to reach transmitters outside the building.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:32:51 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/09/navy-yard-responders-say-rescue-was-hampered-bad-radios/70616/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	In the aftermath of this week&amp;#39;s Navy Yard shooting,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/09/how-did-dc-shooter-aaron-alexis-get-gun-and-security-clearance/69520/"&gt;questions&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;continue to be raised not just about shooter and his actions, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/news/323495-radios-failed-during-navy-yard-attack-first-responders-say"&gt;about the seemingly limited effectiveness of the first response&lt;/a&gt;. Several firefighters and police officers say that they had trouble communicating during the chaotic moments of the shooting, because their radios were not functioning properly inside Building 197.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Federal firefighters and Navy police officers&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2013/09/20/2841657/"&gt;say they were given radios&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that initially worked properly, but as they went deeper into the building in pursuit of the gunman, they could no longer communicate with each other or to anyone outside the building. The radios were reportedly not powerful enough to reach transmitters outside the building. Others say they could hear the communications on their own radios, but could not respond in kind, forcing them to use their cellphones to talk to people on the outside.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Radios belonging to the D.C fire department&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.wtop.com/1385/3458152/Navy-firefighters-Radios-failed-during-Navy-Yard-shooting-"&gt;appeared to work much better&lt;/a&gt;, but they could not communicate with rescuers belong to other units,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/navy-yard-first-responders-complain-bad-radios-97091.html"&gt;so federal officers had to turn to cellphones or runners to enable communications&lt;/a&gt;. Even if the Navy radios had been working, they would not have been compatible with those used by the officers of the Metropolitan Police Department.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Even worse, some of the Navy employees say this was a known issue well before the shooting, but little was done to correct it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/09/navy-yard-responders-say-rescuse-was-hampered-bad-radios/69663/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read the full story at TheAtlanticWire.com.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>NSA Searches Some Americans' Emails for Any Mention of Foreign Suspects</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/08/nsa-searches-some-americans-emails-any-mention-foreign-suspects/68315/</link><description>Agents are reportedly combing over thousands and thousands of emails without warrants.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:04:31 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/08/nsa-searches-some-americans-emails-any-mention-foreign-suspects/68315/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The National Security Agency says it doesn&amp;#39;t target American citizens when searching through its vast quantities of data looking for threats, but that doesn&amp;#39;t mean it won&amp;#39;t look through your email.&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/us/broader-sifting-of-data-abroad-is-seen-by-nsa.html?hp&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;has the latest revelation in the never-ending flood of leaks&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;about how NSA conducts its business, and the newest one suggests that thousands and thousands of emails, including those sent and received by American citizens, are being combed over by intelligence agents without a warrant.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The description of the program is a little confusing, but (we think) it works like this: Say NSA the wants to find out information about a particular individual or &amp;quot;target.&amp;quot; Since NSA is already authorized to intercept any electronic communication that crosses U.S. borders, their servers are already soaking up this data on an ongoing basis. (And that probably doesn&amp;#39;t even include &lt;a href="http://rt.com/news/germany-nsa-sharing-surveillance-179/"&gt;the &amp;quot;massive amounts&amp;quot; of data&lt;/a&gt; that countries like Germany give to the NSA everyday.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	To find out more about the target, NSA copies a large selection of the data and runs a keyword search for something very specific, like a name or an email address or a phone number. In &amp;quot;a small number of seconds,&amp;quot; the program then take any communication that matches that search and sets it aside for actual humans to look at later. The rest is deleted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/08/nsa-searches-americans-emails-any-mention-foreign-suspects/68116/"&gt;Read more on &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;






&lt;p&gt;

(&lt;em&gt;Image via &lt;a href=http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-134267633/stock-photo-e-mail.html?src=csl_recent_image-1&gt;Pavel Ignatov&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a  href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&amp;pl=edit-00"&gt;Shutterstock.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;


]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Mastermind of 9/11 Attacks Designed a Vacuum Cleaner From His CIA Prison</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/07/mastermind-911-attacks-designed-vacuum-cleaner-his-cia-prison/66431/</link><description>Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, captured in 2003, was allowed to spend time designing a new appliance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:54:46 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/07/mastermind-911-attacks-designed-vacuum-cleaner-his-cia-prison/66431/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The man long-considered the most responsible for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks has been in prison a long time&amp;mdash;so long that he appears to have had time to reinvent common household appliances. A&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-exclusive-cia-and-secret-vacuum-cleaner"&gt;new report from the Associated Press&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;claims that&amp;nbsp;Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was captured by the CIA in 2003, was allowed to spend free time working on designs for a new vacuum cleaner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	CIA officials says Mohammed was allowed to indulge his hobby &amp;mdash; he actually&amp;nbsp;has a degree in mechanical engineering from a North Carolina university &amp;mdash; both as a reward for good behavior and to keep him sane. They were concerned that his long imprisonment might do so much psychological damage that he would no longer be useful as source for information. (Other detainees have experienced severe mental breakdowns as result of their torture and long&amp;nbsp;confinement.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The&amp;nbsp;terrorist leader had already been tortured numerous times while being held in secret &amp;quot;black site&amp;quot; prisons in Eastern Europe, and his value as a prisoner had been mostly exhausted. But agents also knew he wasn&amp;#39;t going to be released anytime soon and he might helpful again in the future, if he stayed healthy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The project was one of many designed to keep prisoners like Mohammed lucid and cooperative. According to the same CIA sources, he would often hold &amp;quot;office hours&amp;quot; with CIA officers, where he would lecture them about Islam and his history of jihad. He also liked to read books, including the Harry Potter series.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/07/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-vacuum-cleaner/67062/"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Read the full story at&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;The Atlantic Wire.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	(&lt;em&gt;Image via &lt;a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-138535049/stock-photo--new-vacuum-cleaner-on-the-floor.html?src=csl_recent_image-1"&gt;Daria Filimonova&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&amp;amp;pl=edit-00"&gt;Shutterstock.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>What Did Tech Companies Know About the NSA and When Did they Know It?</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/06/what-did-tech-companies-know-about-nsa-and-when-did-they-know-it/64457/</link><description>Tech giants have denied they were in on the surveillance plan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:41:31 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/06/what-did-tech-companies-know-about-nsa-and-when-did-they-know-it/64457/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The technology giants that were implicated&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/06/nsa-prism-program/65994/"&gt;in the NSA/data mining bombshell&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;have so&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/06/prism-companies-start-denying-knowledge-nsa-program-collecting-their-users-data/65996/"&gt;vigorously&amp;nbsp;denied&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;any acknowledgment of the program that&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;has had to quietly pull back its claim that the major firms were complicit in the snooping. In the original version of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Post&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;story that went up on Thursday, the paper claimed that nine companies mentioned by name in the report &amp;quot;participate knowingly&amp;quot; in the widespread collection of data from their servers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Reporters Barton Gellman and Laura Poitras did write that &amp;quot;several&amp;quot; of the companies they reached out to before publication had denied knowledge of the program, but that did not cause them leave out that assertion at publication. Once the story broke, however,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/06/prism-companies-start-denying-knowledge-nsa-program-collecting-their-users-data/65996/"&gt;the companies went on the defensive&lt;/a&gt;, issuing very public denials that they were in on the plan. The denials were&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-07/apple-to-yahoo-deny-providing-u-s-government-access-to-servers.html"&gt;so stout&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that the paper seems to have walked back that small, but important aspect of the story. It appears&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://thenextweb.com/us/2013/06/07/wapost-backtracks-on-claim-tech-companies-participate-knowingly-in-prism-data-collection/?fromcat=all"&gt;the phrase &amp;quot;participate knowingly&amp;quot; has been removed from the piece&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and an explanatory paragraph added in that subtly acknowledges it may have been the result of a misunderstanding. There are no notes or indications on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Post&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;website that the story had been altered.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Given the fact that NSA&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324798904578529912280347482.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet"&gt;acknowledges the PRISM program exists&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(and defends it as vital and useful) and the fact that tech companies claim so strongly to know nothing about it, it seems there&amp;#39;s going to be some debate over the next few days about how exactly the program worked. There is also sure to be lots of fingerpointing and accusations that tech companies are either lying or foolish. (Everyone already thinks that about the government.) While the Director of National Intelligence&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/191-press-releases-2013/868-dni-statement-on-recent-unauthorized-disclosures-of-classified-information"&gt;has promised more information&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;about how it was supposed to work, the squabble over logistics and responsibility is likely to overshadow the larger debate about whether this should be happening at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/06/washington-post-nsa-backtrack-denials/65998/"&gt;Read more on &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>This Stem-Cell Cloning Breakthrough Is Going to Revive the Same Old Debate</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/05/stem-cell-cloning-breakthrough-going-revive-same-old-debate/63197/</link><description>Researchers in Oregon are creating perfectly matched human tissues through the process of cell cloning.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:22:25 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/05/stem-cell-cloning-breakthrough-going-revive-same-old-debate/63197/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Researchers in Oregon claim to have&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/news/human-stem-cells-created-by-cloning-1.12983"&gt;solved the tricky problem of cloning human stem cells&lt;/a&gt;, but you&amp;#39;re more likely to see a duplicate of a years-old ethics debate than you are a duplicate human.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The&amp;nbsp;breakthrough&amp;nbsp;is one that&amp;#39;s been long sought after by biologists:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22540374"&gt;creating perfectly matched human tissues&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;through the process of cell cloning. In the past, researchers have had success with cloning animals through a technique known as&amp;nbsp;somatic-cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), where the nucleus of an&amp;nbsp;unfertilized&amp;nbsp;egg is replaced with the DNA of a donor cell. (That&amp;#39;s how Dolly the sheep was born.) The egg can then be turned into an embryo, with DNA that matches the original donor exactly. Later, stem cells from that developing embryo could be harvested and, in theory, be cultured to become almost any type of human cell there is. That would open a huge array of new medical&amp;nbsp;treatments, from curing diabetes to fixing spinal cord injuries&amp;nbsp;to providing rejection-proof organ transplants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	In the last decade or so, doctors&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.trust.org/item/20130515155958-s5daz/?source%20=%20hpbreaking"&gt;had mostly turned away from SCNT as a means of producing &amp;quot;patient-specific&amp;quot; embryonic stem cells&lt;/a&gt;. They did so for a variety of reasons, but the biggest was that it didn&amp;#39;t really work on humans. Researchers in South Korea claimed to have done just that in 2004, but their finding&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/southkorea/6435714/Disgraced-South-Korean-scientist-guilty-of-fraud-over-faked-stem-cell-research.html"&gt;turned out to be a fake&lt;/a&gt;. Other attempts created imperfect results or were too expensive or inefficient. As a result, scientists have focused on other methods of attempting to create patient-specific stem cells. The focus now is on &amp;quot;reprogramming&amp;quot; adult cells so they become stem cells again, which has had limited success. (The new cells are called pluripotent cells, or iPS cells.)&amp;nbsp;As one surprised researcher put it, &amp;quot;the most surprising thing [about this paper] is that somebody is still doing human [SCNT] in the era of iPS cells.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/05/new-stem-cell-cloning-debate/65262/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;

(&lt;em&gt;Image via &lt;a href=http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-121154842/stock-photo-injecting-dna-into-a-stem-cell-d-rendered-illustration.html?src=csl_recent_image-1&gt;Spectral-Design&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a  href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&amp;pl=edit-00"&gt;Shutterstock.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>An Air Force Unit Controlling Our Nuclear Weapons Is Filled with 'Rot'</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/05/air-force-unit-controlling-our-nuclear-weapons-filled-rot/63040/</link><description>An internal inspection at the Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota found the unit that oversees nuclear missile launches to be so woefully unprepared.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 12:31:24 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/05/air-force-unit-controlling-our-nuclear-weapons-filled-rot/63040/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	All-out nuclear war isn&amp;#39;t something Americans worry about too much these days, which is good, because the people in charge of fighting that war have apparently been doing a lousy job lately.&amp;nbsp;According to the Associated Press, an internal inspection&amp;nbsp;at the Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota found the unit that oversees nuclear missile launches&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-air-force-sidelines-17-icbm-officers-070914385.html"&gt;to be so woefully unprepared&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that an unprecedented&amp;nbsp;17 officers had to be stripped of their duties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The group&amp;mdash;which is responsible for launching nuclear-armed Minutemen missiles all around the globe at a moment&amp;#39;s notice&amp;mdash;was lambasted in internal emails last month, after coming as close to failing the inspection as you can get without actually failing. (The group received a &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; grade on its most important function, launch&amp;nbsp;proficiency.) Members of the group were&amp;nbsp;accused&amp;nbsp;of safety violations, questioning orders, and showing general&amp;nbsp;disrespect&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;superior&amp;nbsp;officers.&amp;nbsp;In the most serious incident, one officer was even accused of intentionally violating a rule that could have compromised the launch codes that enable the missiles to be fired from their underground silos.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The deputy commander of the unit said the inspection uncovered &amp;quot;such rot&amp;quot; that the unit needs to be rebuilt&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;from the ground up.&amp;quot; The 17 officers have been &amp;quot;benched&amp;quot; for 60 days, but have not lost their jobs or rank.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/05/air-force-officers-nuclear-weapons-rot/64991/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>We're One Step Closer to On-Demand Organ Transplants</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/04/were-one-step-closer-demand-organ-transplants/62556/</link><description>Scientists say they have successfully "grown" a kidney in a laboratory environment and transplanted it back into a healthy animal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:18:03 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/04/were-one-step-closer-demand-organ-transplants/62556/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital say&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22123386"&gt;they have successfully &amp;quot;grown&amp;quot; a kidney&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;in a&amp;nbsp;laboratory&amp;nbsp;environment and transplanted it back into a healthy animal, raising the tantalizing&amp;nbsp;possibility of a future with organs grown in lab dishes&amp;mdash;and a potential end to donor shortages. So far, the technique has only been used on rats, but with more time and practice, it could be scaled up to pigs, then humans, and possibly even other organs, like livers and hearts. The study was published&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nm.3154.html"&gt;in the journal&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Nature Medicine&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;this week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Here&amp;#39;s how it works: The researchers took an existing kidney out of a rat and stripped it of all its old cells, leaving behind a &amp;quot;scaffold,&amp;quot; that is just strands of cellulose and protein making up the frame of a kidney. (This framework also includes the kidney&amp;#39;s blood vessels and connecting&amp;nbsp;structures.) Doctors then pumped a compound, including stem cells from young rats, back into the structure and over the course of a couple of weeks, the cells attached themselves to the scaffold,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_differentiation"&gt;differentiated&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;into the various components of the organ,&amp;nbsp;and re-grew to form the rest of the kidney. Once transplanted back into a rat, it functioned like a regular kidney, creating urine and filtering waste&amp;mdash;though not as efficiently as a healthy one can. The process still needs some refinement to improve the quality of the new organ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/04/lab-grown-kidney-organ-transplants/64237/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Half of All U.S. Rivers Are Too Polluted for Our Health</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/half-all-us-rivers-are-too-polluted-our-health/62117/</link><description>A new report by the EPA found that the majority of rivers and streams in this country can't support healthy aquatic life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:12:45 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/half-all-us-rivers-are-too-polluted-our-health/62117/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	A&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/26A31559BB37A7D285257B3A00589DDF"&gt;new report by the&amp;nbsp;Environmental&amp;nbsp;Protection Agency&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;found that the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/55-streams-rivers-rated-poor-article-1.1299841"&gt;majority of rivers and streams in this country&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;can&amp;#39;t support healthy&amp;nbsp;aquatic&amp;nbsp;life and the trend is going in the wrong direction. The report labels&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/riverssurvey/index.cfm"&gt;55 percent of the nation&amp;#39;s water ways&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;as being in &amp;quot;poor&amp;quot; conidtion and another 23 precent as just &amp;quot;fair.&amp;quot; Only 21 percent of rivers are considered &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;healthy biological communities.&amp;quot; Even worse, the number of rivers and streams that qualify as &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; went down seven precent between 2004 and 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The reason for these failing grades is, of course, pollution;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/epa-report-more-than-half-nations-rivers-in-poor-shape/2013/03/26/a91dd714-965f-11e2-8b4e-0b56f26f28de_story.html"&gt;specifically, phosphorus and nitrogen pollution&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that comes from fertilizer and wastewater run-off. Those chemicals, which come from farms and industrial sites, choke off healthy plant growth, which turn leads to more soil erosion, more flooding, and unhealthy fish and wildlife.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/03/half-all-us-rivers-are-too-polluted-our-health/63579/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>New 'Cosmic Blueprint' Lets Us Look at the Earliest Days of the Universe</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/new-cosmic-blueprint-lets-us-look-earliest-days-universe/62036/</link><description>The new map of cosmic radiation shows us the universe at 380,000 years old.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:30:37 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/new-cosmic-blueprint-lets-us-look-earliest-days-universe/62036/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Scientists at the European Space Agency have released the &amp;quot;oldest&amp;quot; picture we have of our universe, revealing a map of cosmic radiation that shows what our skies looked like at the very earliest moments of creation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Of course, nothing like planets or stars existed back then since the universe&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/21/tech/innovation/universe-planck-map/index.html?hpt=hp_c3"&gt;was just a baby&lt;/a&gt;&amp;mdash;about 380,000 years old. That&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/03/new-planck-data?cid=co6561024"&gt;was when the first atoms formed&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;emitting&amp;nbsp;the first light, and the dark &amp;quot;soup&amp;quot; of the universe finally began to fill up with actual matter. The new images released by ESA were constructed out of data gathered by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Planck_overview"&gt;the Planck space telescope&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;over the last year and a half, revealing&amp;nbsp;fluctuations&amp;nbsp;in that early light that appear to perfectly support current theories about cosmology and the early expansion of the universe.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Planck/Planck_reveals_an_almost_perfect_Universe"&gt;Planck telescope&amp;nbsp;detects&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;cosmic background&amp;nbsp;radiation,&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;which is basically the leftover heat and light that still remains in the universe after being first emitted after the Big Bang. More than 13 billion years later, that radiation has cooled to just 2.7 degrees above absolute zero, but the Planck&amp;#39;s sophisticated instruments can detect microscopic fluctuations in the temperature, &amp;quot;that correspond to regions of slightly different densities at very early times.&amp;quot; By&amp;nbsp;examining the&amp;nbsp;radiation&amp;nbsp;today, we can work backwards to get a sense of what it was like way back when.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/03/new-cosmic-blueprint-lets-us-look-earliest-days-universe/63416/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Is the CIA Getting Out of the Drone Business?</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/cia-getting-out-drone-business/61981/</link><description>The White House plans to take the power to launch drone strikes away from the CIA and make the program the exclusive to the Defense Department, according to reports.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:40:56 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/cia-getting-out-drone-business/61981/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Daniel Klaidman of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;The Daily Beast&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;reports that the&amp;nbsp;White House will soon take&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/19/exclusive-no-more-drones-for-cia.html"&gt;the power to launch lethal drone strikes away from the CIA&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and make the program the exclusive domain of the Defense Department. Because the military and intelligence services operate under a different set of rules, the move would consolidate all drone operations under a single command and a single set of procedure. It&amp;nbsp;could also (potentially) add new layers of&amp;nbsp;transparency&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;accountability&amp;nbsp;to what has become one of the government&amp;#39;s most controversial operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The shift may not change much in the real world of missile strikes and terrorist hunting, as drones will continue to be a major tool in the U.S. arsenal.&amp;nbsp;However, it&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/03/no-more-drones-for-cia/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitter"&gt;could signal a major shift in the legal and diplomatic basis&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for the program. For example, one of the most important distinctions between CIA operations and military ones is the difference between &amp;quot;covert&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;clandestine.&amp;quot; The military can keep its &amp;quot;clandestine&amp;quot; activities classified or secret&amp;mdash;like say a SEAL team raid to kill a wanted terrorist. But if Congress or a judge asks, they can&amp;#39;t pretend they didn&amp;#39;t happen. The CIA, on the other hand, is allowed to declare certain missions to be &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;covert.&amp;quot; (Like say, sneaking American citizens out of a hostile country.) That means that, legally, they can deny&amp;nbsp;that program even&amp;nbsp;exists, shielding those responsible from accountability and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/01/everything-we-know-so-far-about-drone-strikes/60903/"&gt;hiding them from the public&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/03/cia-getting-out-drone-business/63320/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>South Korean Websites Taken Down In Possible Cyberattack From North Korea</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2013/03/south-korean-websites-taken-down-possible-cyberattack-north-korea/61980/</link><description>The web servers of three television networks and three major banks in South Korea were brought down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:53:53 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2013/03/south-korean-websites-taken-down-possible-cyberattack-north-korea/61980/</guid><category>Cybersecurity</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The web servers of three&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2013/03/20/0200000000AEN20130320008051315.HTML"&gt;television networks and three major banks&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;in South Korea&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/20/us-korea-cyber-outage-idUSBRE92J06F20130320"&gt;were brought down by cyberattacks earlier today&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and,&amp;nbsp;naturally, the first suspected culprit is North Korean hackers. Websites and ATMs were&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/hackers-target-south-korean-banks-and-broadcasters"&gt;offline for several hours&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and even some employees at the TV stations were not able to get their computers up and running. Police&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/20/17380277-south-korea-on-alert-after-hackers-strike-banks-broadcasters?lite"&gt;called the attack &amp;quot;pretty massive&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the TV stations were still struggling to get web operations back online. (Their broadcasts were not affected.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	South Korea military officials did not explicitly blame the North for taking down their sites, but they did&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2013/03/20/0200000000AEN20130320007951315.HTML"&gt;raise their readiness level&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;in response to the outage. Just last week, it was&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/03/north-korea-complains-cyberattacks-us/63143/"&gt;the North that was accusing the South&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(with some help from the United States) of launching cyberattacks on their websites, continuing the escalating back-and-forth rhetoric of recent weeks. The North also had their share of internet outages that also&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/south-korean-banks-media-report-network-crash-062049414.html"&gt;appeared to have been the result of deliberate&amp;nbsp;attacks.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/03/south-korean-websites-taken-down-possible-cyberattack-north/63316/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Obama Says Iran Is a Year Away from a Nuke</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/obama-says-iran-year-away-nuke/61895/</link><description>The President tried to reassure Israelis that the need for a preemptive strike against is still a long way off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:00:52 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/obama-says-iran-year-away-nuke/61895/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;As part of a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/diplomania/obama-hoping-to-reach-out-to-israelis-but-only-one-lucky-tv-station-will-get-an-interview.premium-1.509097" style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;mini press-tour&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;to set up his first presidential trip to Israel next week, Barack&amp;nbsp;Obama told an Israeli television station that Iran is at least a year away from developing a nuclear weapon.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/14/world/meast/israel-obama-iran/index.html?hpt=hp_t3" style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;In an interview with Channel 2 News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12px;"&gt;, Obama tried to reassure Israelis that the need for a preemptive strike against is still a long way off, while&amp;nbsp;simultaneously&amp;nbsp;trying to convince them that his position &amp;nbsp;on an Iranian bomb is &amp;quot;crystal clear&amp;quot; and that it&amp;nbsp;continues&amp;nbsp;to be a &amp;quot;red line&amp;quot; for the U.S.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Everyone seems to have a educated guess&amp;mdash;some more educated than others&amp;mdash;about how far along the Iranians have progressed in their quest for nuclear bombs, but the fact that this guess is coming from the President of the United States makes the number fairly official. Also consider his intended audience, whose trust he desperately wants to earn. Obama has already stressed that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/14/us-usa-israel-obama-idUSBRE92D06O20130314"&gt;he plans to speak directly to the Israeli people&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;next week, in order to avoid his message being filtered through the lens of Israel&amp;#39;s own politicians. The president has&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/03/white-house-obama-skipping-knesset-to-speak-to-israeli-159369.html"&gt;ignored offers to speak to the Israeli Knesset&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(as Bill Clinton and George W. Bush did)&amp;nbsp;and will instead deliver his largest address during the trip at a public convention center.&amp;nbsp;He will meet with Israel&amp;#39;s president and prime minister, of course, but aides say he wants the chance to deliver his message directly to the public and Israeli youth. The speech is said to contain&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/288325-obama-echoes-cairo-speech-with-outreach-to-youth-minorities-in-israel"&gt;echoes of his address to the Muslim world&lt;/a&gt;, delivered&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_889oBKkNU"&gt;in Cairo&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;shortly after he took office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/03/obama-says-iran-year-away-nuke/63134/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>North Korea Shuts Off Its Emergency Hotline to Seoul</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/north-korea-shuts-its-emergency-hotline-seoul/61791/</link><description>The hotline was the only formal communication between Pyongyang and Seoul.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:53:49 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/north-korea-shuts-its-emergency-hotline-seoul/61791/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	After last week&amp;#39;s threat to call off their armistice with South Korea, officials&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/11/us-korea-north-idUSBRE92A01820130311"&gt;disconnected the hotline built to avert disaster&lt;/a&gt;. Because the two countries are officially&amp;nbsp;not speaking to each other&amp;mdash;they have no embassies or diplomatic relations&amp;mdash;the only formal communication line between Pyongyang and Seoul is a Red Cross telephone line that was set up in 1971. They test the line twice a day, but when the South called the North at 9:00 a.m. on Monday morning, nobody picked up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	No need to panic just yet. The&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9921623/North-Korea-cuts-off-hotline-to-South.html"&gt;North has done this before&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;when it&amp;#39;s been ticked off at the South. (The last time was in 2010.) But the message is clear that they are not backing down from their recent saber-rattling over the joint U.S.-South Korea military exercises.&amp;nbsp;They also aren&amp;#39;t pleased about the new U.N. Security Council resolutions&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/03/07/173712148/u-n-security-council-approves-new-sanctions-on-north-korea"&gt;that were placed on them&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;last Thursday.&amp;nbsp;Even though they haven&amp;#39;t acted on it yet, the North&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/11/world/asia/north-korea-armistice/?hpt=hp_t1"&gt;is still talking as if the cease fire agreement&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(that dates back to 1953) is kaput, and that the two countries are once again in a state of open war. They even got a few thousand friends together to &amp;quot;celebrate&amp;quot; the military for tearing up the armistice.&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/03/north-korea-shuts-their-emergency-hotline-seoul/62944/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>North Korea Is Now Threatening a Preemptive Nuclear Attack</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/north-korea-now-threatening-preemptive-nuclear-attack/61738/</link><description>The threats come as the U.N. condemns North Korea's latest nuclear test.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:50:06 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/03/north-korea-now-threatening-preemptive-nuclear-attack/61738/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	While the U.N. Security Council has voted for&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2013/03/07/9/0301000000AEN20130307009300315F.HTML"&gt;harsh new sanctions&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;against North Korea, that nation&amp;#39;s military has found a way to take its fighting words to&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/un-vote-new-north-korea-sanctions-thursday"&gt;yet another hyperbolic level&lt;/a&gt;. In&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bnowire.com/inbox/?id=1615"&gt;a press statement complaining&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;about both the sanctions and ongoing military exercises by the U.S. and South Korea, the DPRK says &amp;quot;it will fully display the might of Songun it built up decades after decades and put an end to the evil cycle of tension.&amp;quot; The statement also breaks out&amp;mdash;literally&amp;mdash;the North&amp;#39;s biggest gun in the threat of &amp;quot;a preemptive nuclear attack.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;
		First, now that the U.S. is set to light a fuse for a nuclear war, the revolutionary armed forces of the DPRK will exercise the right to a preemptive nuclear attack to destroy the strongholds of the aggressors and to defend the supreme interests of the country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Before you climb into your bomb shelter its important to note that the North&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/12/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-facts/59904/"&gt;has shown no ability&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to launch a missile that can either carry a nuclear warhead or reach the United States. It also seems unlikely that they would annihilate Seoul, despite numerous threats to do so in the past. However, the talk of nullifying the 60-year-old cease fire agreement and jumping in a second Korean War is worrying, particularly with American, North, and South Korean soliders and sailors conducting their drills in such close proximity. The North began&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://world.huanqiu.com/photo/2013-03/2685011.html"&gt;its own military exercises&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;this week, in response to the annual joint war games that the South is holding with the U.S. over the next two months. (Earlier this week, the same DPRK leaders&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/03/north-korea-says-korean-war-back/62754/"&gt;threatened to tear up the first Korean War&amp;#39;s armistice agreement&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;if the operations didn&amp;#39;t stop.) If any of those ships happen to wander to close to each other or someone shoots the wrong way, there very well could be a bad incident that might lead to an escalation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/03/north-korea-preemptive-nuclear-attack/62842/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Pro-Assad Hackers Take Over AFP's Twitter with Syrian Propaganda Photos</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/modernization/2013/02/pro-assad-hackers-take-over-afps-twitter-syrian-propaganda-photos/61538/</link><description>The account is an odd choice for a hack, since the account has about 3,600 followers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:54:05 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/modernization/2013/02/pro-assad-hackers-take-over-afps-twitter-syrian-propaganda-photos/61538/</guid><category>Modernization</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	After a couple of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2013/02/jeep-twitter-hacked-cadillac/62297/"&gt;high-profile corporate hacks last week&lt;/a&gt;, a much nastier Twitter sabotage took place today on behalf of supporters of Syria&amp;#39;s Bashar Al-Assad. Around noon Eastern time, the&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/AFPphoto"&gt;photographs-only account of news service Agence France-Presse&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;began tweeting images from the conflict in Syria. Except they were not only far below the quality levels of professional photographers, they were graphic images from the war, which the captions depicted as the handiwork of thuggish rebel armies, backed by Western conspirators.&amp;nbsp;Calling the rebels &amp;quot;#Obama backed&amp;quot; (hashtags are important) and accusing them both killing children and using them as soliders, whoever was behind the hack has a pretty obvious bias.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The @AFPphoto account is an odd choice for a hack, since the account has only been around for a few weeks and has just about 3,600 followers. (Perhaps that made it an&amp;nbsp;easier&amp;nbsp;target?) Yet, rather than posting rap videos or inappropriate&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2013/02/burger-kings-unfortunate-twitter-hack/62251/"&gt;jokes about hamburgers&lt;/a&gt;, this one decided to go with bloodly pro-Syria&amp;nbsp;propaganda. Not the usual route for most Twitter hackers, and also one that&amp;#39;s unlikely to win over a lot of people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/02/afp-twitter-hack/62539/"&gt;Read more at The Atlantic Wire.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Inspectors Find Major Iran Nuclear Move Ahead of Talks</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/inspectors-find-major-iran-nuclear-move-ahead-talks/61462/</link><description>The rogue state has been installing new centrifuges.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:40:27 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/inspectors-find-major-iran-nuclear-move-ahead-talks/61462/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	A week after being sent home from Tehran empty-handed, U.N. nuclear inspectors have revealed that Iran&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/iran-installs-advanced-enrichment-centrifuges-iaea-164407221.html"&gt;has being installing new centrifuges&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;at their&amp;nbsp;main nuclear plant, a clear act of defiance ahead of an upcoming round of talks.&amp;nbsp;The Internal Atomic Energy Agency&amp;#39;s lead investigators went to Iran&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/nuclear-negotiations-iran-fail-again/62128/"&gt;last week&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to try gain access to the country&amp;#39;s largest nuclear facility, but were rebuffed at every turn. IAEA head Herman Nackaerts complained about the lack of cooperation from Iran&amp;#39;s nuclear agency, specifically their refusal to let&amp;nbsp;inspections&amp;nbsp;see the Parchin military facility. His&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-21537206"&gt;report on this latest visit&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;reveals it&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;actually&amp;nbsp;the Natanz plant that is being upgrade with 180 new centrifuge machines, which would&lt;a href="http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_02_21/Iran-is-installing-faster-centrifuges-at-Natanz/"&gt;greatly increase&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Iran&amp;#39;s ability to enrich uranium to a point where it can be weaponized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/iran-nuclear-centrifuges/62386/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>North Korea's Nuclear Negotiating Game Has It All Backwards</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/north-koreas-nuclear-negotiating-game-has-it-all-backwards/61352/</link><description>The rogue state says it wants to conduct one or two more nuclear tests.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:09:41 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/north-koreas-nuclear-negotiating-game-has-it-all-backwards/61352/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	North Korea says it&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/15/us-korea-north-nuclear-idUSBRE91E0J820130215"&gt;wants to conduct one or two more nuclear tests&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;this year in order to force the United States into diplomatic talks&amp;mdash;by doing the exact opposite of what the United States wants them to. Since the nuclear test they conducted on Tuesday brought&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.voanews.com/content/us-un-reaction-north-korea-nuclear-test/1604041.html"&gt;near universal condemnations&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/kerry-provoked-north-koreas-provocative-provocation_701243.html"&gt;rumblings of new Security Council sanctions&lt;/a&gt;, Pyongyang has apparently decided that the best course of action is to become even more belligerent until the Americans give in and come back to the negotiating table.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The only flaw in that strategy is that the United States has spent the last decade doing everything it can to avoid direct negotiation, usually by pointing out (correctly) that such a move would be rewarding Pyongyang&amp;#39;s terrible behavior. U.S. officials did&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/302465134276771840"&gt;call&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;on North Korea to &amp;quot;refrain from additional&amp;nbsp;provocative&amp;nbsp;actions&amp;quot; after Friday&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/15/us-korea-north-nuclear-idUSBRE91E0J820130215"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that Pyongyang had informed Beijing of the new test planning. But North Korea already broke one major peace agreement, and American diplomats are not interested in being played for fools twice. (That&amp;#39;s one reason they insist on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-party_talks"&gt;six-party talks&lt;/a&gt;, so the responsibility for any future agreements are equally shared.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	North Korea has&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cfr.org/proliferation/six-party-talks-north-koreas-nuclear-program/p13593#p5"&gt;consistently said&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;they want direct, bilateral talks with Washington, including&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/north-korea-demands-peace-treaty-us-032306308.html"&gt;a new treaty&lt;/a&gt;to formally end the Korean War, but both George W. Bush and Barack Obama have held the line by insisting that the other side give up their nuclear weapons first, and then they&amp;#39;ll talk. North Korea has responded by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2013_01-02/North-Korea-Launch-Spurs-Talk-of-New-Policy"&gt;conducting more tests, building more rockets&lt;/a&gt;, and issuing more threats. If the end goal was peace, that hasn&amp;#39;t helped matters in the slightest.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/north-korea-nuclear-negotiations/62194/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Nuclear Negotiations with Iran Fail... Again</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/nuclear-negotiations-iran-fail-again/61316/</link><description>Herman Nackaerts of the IAEA arrived in Vienna this morning to report that no progress had been made on an agreement to inspect Iran's nuclear energy sites.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:29:32 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/nuclear-negotiations-iran-fail-again/61316/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Leading&amp;nbsp;negotiators&amp;nbsp;for the U.N.&amp;#39;s nuclear watchdog agency left Tehran this morning after another round of talks with Iranian nuclear inspections&amp;nbsp;accomplished absolutely nothing. Herman Nackaerts of the International atomic Energy Agency arrived Vienna this morning to report that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2013/Feb-14/206424-un-nuclear-watchdog-and-iran-fail-to-reach-deal.ashx"&gt;no progress had been made&lt;/a&gt;on an agreement to inspect Iran&amp;#39;s nuclear energy sites, and there were also no plans made for future talks. Nackaerts and his team had been hoping to get a look at the Parchin nuclear facility, a military site that&amp;nbsp;inspectors&amp;nbsp;believe has been used or could be used for weapons tests, but he told reports that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/15/world/middleeast/nuclear-watchdog-says-no-deal-reached-with-iran.html?hp&amp;amp;_r=0"&gt;they were once again denied&amp;nbsp;access&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This is just the latest in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/02/un-inspector-iran-throw-their-hands/49018/"&gt;a string of frustrating failures&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for the U.N. agency, which has&amp;nbsp;continued to push for more openness from Iran, but has been met with nothing but delays and denials. Iran has told the IAEA that it was installing new equipment&amp;nbsp;to produce enriched uranium&amp;mdash;&lt;em&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iranian-buying-spree-raises-concerns-about-major-expansion-of-nuclear-capacity/2013/02/13/2090805c-7537-11e2-8f84-3e4b513b1a13_story.html"&gt;reported just today&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that they&amp;#39;re hoarding centrifuge magnets&amp;mdash;while also announcing that it would&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.rttnews.com/2055653/iran-begins-converting-enriched-uranium-into-reactor-fuel.aspx?type=gn&amp;amp;utm_source=google&amp;amp;utm_campaign=sitemap"&gt;convert some of its stockpile to reactor fuel&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(which makes it useless for nuclear weapons.) However,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/us-iran-nuclear-iaea-idUSBRE91C1GM20130213"&gt;without the open inspections&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;it&amp;#39;s nearly impossible to gauge the true strength of their program or how close they actually are to having a bomb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/nuclear-negotiations-iran-fail-again/62128/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Why North Korea's Nuclear Program Can't Be Stopped</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/why-north-koreas-nuclear-program-cant-be-stopped/61247/</link><description>The world can't negotiate with North Korea, because the world doesn't have anything North Korea wants.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:21:24 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/why-north-koreas-nuclear-program-cant-be-stopped/61247/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Despite&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron"&gt;years&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;of war, sanctions, threats, and complete&amp;nbsp;ostracizing&amp;nbsp;from&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;rest of the planet, North Korea continues to defy all attempts to halt their nuclear operations. The state&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/north-korea-nuclear-test/62029/"&gt;latest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/north-korea-nuclear-test/62029/"&gt;&amp;nbsp;test on Tuesday&lt;/a&gt;, its&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9864123/North-Korea-nuclear-tests-timeline.html"&gt;third in seven years&lt;/a&gt;, has officials around the globe condemning the regime and calling for new punishments. All sides&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9865084/North-Korea-little-world-can-do-in-response-to-nuclear-test.html"&gt;are calling for a strong response&lt;/a&gt;, and the U.N. Security Council was meeting under South Korea on Tuesday morning, but since that international response won&amp;#39;t include an all-out war, the only option is more pressure, followed by more&amp;nbsp;negotiations.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Unfortunately, the world can&amp;#39;t negotiate with North Korea, because the world&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/nuclear-test-in-north-korea-solicits-angry-responses-in-europe-and-us-a-882909.html"&gt;doesn&amp;#39;t have anything North Korea wants&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Yes,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.therecord.com/news/world/article/885364--obama-urges-swift-international-response-to-north-korea-s-latest-nuclear-test"&gt;there are many things it&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;needs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;mdash; food, power, trade &amp;mdash; but the Kim dynasty was been built on the idea that Koreans can and should provide those things for themselves. (Unfortunately, for most of their citizens, that means going without life&amp;#39;s basic necessities.) Even the countries that share North Korea&amp;#39;s borders and even its worldview &amp;mdash; China and the old USSR/Russia &amp;mdash; are only nominally considered allies. The Chinese&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/world/asia/north-korea-nuclear-test-poses-challenge-to-chinas-xi-jinping.html?hp"&gt;haven&amp;#39;t been able&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to keep the nuclear and missile programs in check, even though Kim Jong-un is as a big headache for Beijing and he is for Washington. The world wants engagement and negotiation; North Korea&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nknews.org/2013/02/breaking-north-korea-tests-nuclear-device/"&gt;wants to prove&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;it doesn&amp;#39;t need the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/north-korea-nuclear-diplomacy/62035/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Iran airs spy footage it (allegedly) took from a captured U.S. drone</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/iran-airs-spy-footage-it-allegedly-took-captured-us-drone/61155/</link><description>Iran says it found the drone in late 2011.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:54:20 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/iran-airs-spy-footage-it-allegedly-took-captured-us-drone/61155/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[Iran is jumping on the drone news bandwagon today, with an expertly&amp;nbsp;timed release that it&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/07/us-iran-drone-idUSBRE9160D620130207"&gt;claims&amp;nbsp;is decrypted surveillance&amp;nbsp;footage&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;taken from a downed American drone. You may recall that in December 2011, the United States&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/12/downed-us-drone-looks-pretty-intact-iranian-tv/45935/"&gt;lost a unmanned, unarmed drone&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;somewhere near the border between Iran and Afghanistan, and that the Iranian military said they found the plane and put it on display. (Iran claimed&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/12/iran-shoots-down-us-drone-and-threatens-retaliation/45708/"&gt;they shot it down&lt;/a&gt;, the Pentagon&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/12/pentagon-denies-iran-shot-down-drone/45752/"&gt;said it was simply lost&lt;/a&gt;.) For the last year or so, they&amp;#39;ve made claims about trying to reverse engineer it, or&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/04/iran-claims-have-cracked-drone-code/51423/"&gt;hack its computer systems,&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;or possibly even sell it to China for spare parts (and intelligence.) Now, the Iranians says that they did crack the American system, and decrypted the camera footage it had shot before it went down.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;p&gt;
	No one&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/07/world/meast/iran-drone-video/index.html"&gt;has been able to confirm that claim&lt;/a&gt;, even after seeing the footage that was&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/07/287743/iran-releases-decoded-video-from-us-drone/"&gt;broadcast on Iranian state TV&lt;/a&gt;. There is reason to be skeptical, of course, since some experts have doubted all along that Iran ever had the U.S. drone in the first place.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/02/iran-broadcasts-spy-footage-it-allegedly-took-captured-us-drone/61888/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;Atlantic Wire.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>The drone secrets inside John Brennan</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/drone-secrets-inside-john-brennan/61136/</link><description>No one knows more about the CIA's drone base in Saudi Arabia than Brennan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:39:59 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/02/drone-secrets-inside-john-brennan/61136/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The United States has been operating&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/brennan-nomination-opens-obama-to-criticism-on-secret-targeted-killings/2013/02/05/8f3c94f0-6fb0-11e2-8b8d-e0b59a1b8e2a_story.html"&gt;a secret CIA drone base&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;out of Saudi Arabia for the last two years &amp;mdash; a landmark&amp;nbsp;counter-terror&amp;nbsp;operation that several news organizations and lawmakers knew about but didn&amp;#39;t acknowledge until today. The catalyst for the story finally breaking is John Brennan&amp;#39;s nomination to head the CIA. As the Obama&amp;nbsp;administration&amp;#39;s&amp;nbsp;top counterterrorism official,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/01/john-brennan-drone-war/60672/"&gt;no one knows more about the drone program&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the U.S.&amp;#39;s most controversial and clandestine operations than Brennan does. His confirmation hearing on Thursday may be the best &amp;mdash; and possibly last &amp;mdash; chance for the American public to learn more about our robotic lethal operations abroad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Now, in a week that has already seen&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/02/take-rare-look-how-obama-decides-send-drones-kill-americans/61794/"&gt;the leak of a &amp;quot;white paper&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;on the targeted killing of American citizens and the administration&amp;#39;s drone program rise from clandestine legalise to coffee-table conversation, many unanswered question still remain: How much else does Brennan know? How much does the Senate? And how much will the Senate Intelligence Committee get Brennan to divulge by week&amp;#39;s end?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Senator Ron Wyden is already becoming more explicit by the day, insisting that he will use the hearing as&amp;nbsp;leverage&amp;nbsp;to extract more&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/02/what-white-house-hasnt-said-about-drones/61806/"&gt;still-classified information from the White House&lt;/a&gt;, saying,&amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;If the Congress doesn&amp;#39;t get answers to these questions now, it&amp;#39;s going to be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get them in the future.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/02/drone-secrets-john-brennan/61852/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Iran sent a monkey into space</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2013/01/iran-sent-monkey-space/60920/</link><description>Iran considers the launch a prelude to sending humans into space.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:33:33 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2013/01/iran-sent-monkey-space/60920/</guid><category>Emerging Tech</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	Iran claims that it&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/01/28/285992/iran-sends-living-creature-into-space/"&gt;sent a living organism&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;--&amp;nbsp;a monkey --&amp;nbsp;into space for the first time ever, without help from any other countries&amp;mdash;and brought it back alive. Iran&amp;#39;s state controlled media&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i4Wrz7ol_n2e0ofhO9BnHsn_VpZw?docId=CNG.d64d0fb0f4b9ebab6cdcc9b61e143ff7.1c1"&gt;announced the news this morning&lt;/a&gt;, without giving much detail, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/12/17/278495/iran-to-send-living-creature-into-space/"&gt;had previously announced last month&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;that a specially designed &amp;quot;bio-capsule&amp;quot; would soon be launched on one of their Kavoshgar (Explorer) 5 rockets, as a &amp;quot;prelude to sending humans into space.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The move is the same&amp;nbsp;preliminary&amp;nbsp;step followed by almost every national space program, though they are obviously slightly behind the schedule set by the great space powers. The U.S. first sent a monkey into space&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkeys_in_space"&gt;in 1948&lt;/a&gt;, but it would be 11 more years before they would manage to bring one back alive. (In case you&amp;#39;re wondering, Able and Miss Baker were&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/photogalleries/space-monkeys-fifty-years/"&gt;the first primates&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to survive space flight.) Then again, Iran only put its first satellite into orbit in 2009, so they&amp;#39;re actually making pretty good progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2013/01/iran-sent-monkey-space/61466/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>Latest flu numbers paint the picture of an epidemic</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/01/latest-flu-numbers-paint-picture-apidemic/60614/</link><description>The Centers for Disease Control is set to release its weekly flu advisory report on Friday.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:46:21 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2013/01/latest-flu-numbers-paint-picture-apidemic/60614/</guid><category>Digital Government</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The Centers for Disease Control is set to release its weekly flu advisory report on Friday, which will show that the nationwide flu epidemic continues to grow, even though&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/11/health/us-flu-season/index.html?hpt=hp_c1"&gt;it may have begun to peak in the states&lt;/a&gt;where it first began. The director of the National Institutes of Health says this year&amp;#39;s season is a &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; flu epidemic that is &amp;quot;still on the uptick.&amp;quot; The flu season&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/01/flu-season-2013/60799/"&gt;started earlier than usual this year&lt;/a&gt;, and the cases that have been reported appear to be more severe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Forty-one states have reported &amp;quot;widespread&amp;quot; flu activity, with 24 of those states being declared &amp;quot;high level.&amp;quot; In addition, two more children were reported to have died of the flu, bringing the total number of deaths to 20 for people under 18 years old. The CDC doesn&amp;#39;t keep a running total of adult deaths, but Massachusetts, one of the hardest hit states, has had 18. Adding up the various state reports would seem to put the total number of deaths near 100.&amp;nbsp;The grim news this week&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/with-severe-flu-season-underway-vaccine-supply-is-running-low/2013/01/10/8960c1b6-5b2c-11e2-beee-6e38f5215402_story.html"&gt;has led to a rush on flu vaccines&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and in turn,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/10/16450765-nasty-flu-season-sparks-spotty-vaccine-shortages?lite"&gt;a shortage of the shots&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;in some areas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/01/latest-flu-numbers-paint-picture-epidemic/60868/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item><item><title>FAA orders review of all Boeing 787 Dreamliners</title><link>https://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2013/01/faa-orders-review-all-boeing-787-dreamliners/60611/</link><description>The safety review of the plane comes after two more dangerous incidents raised concerns about their integrity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dashiell Bennett, The Wire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:08:15 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2013/01/faa-orders-review-all-boeing-787-dreamliners/60611/</guid><category>Emerging Tech</category><content:encoded>&lt;![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;
	The Federal Aviation Administration has ordered&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/faa-ordering-review-of-boeing-787-dreamliner-2013-01-11"&gt;a safety review&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;of Boeing&amp;#39;s flagship plane after&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20988117"&gt;two more dangerous incidents&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;raised troubling concerns about their integrity. The latest problems came on Friday, when a Japanese flight crew&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/12/business/global/cracks-appear-in-cockpit-window-of-boeing-787.html"&gt;found a crack in a cockpit window&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;of a 787 Dreamliner and different 787 on the same airline suffered an oil leak inside an engine. That makes&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2013/01/11/boeing-dreamliner-incident/1826083/"&gt;five separate incidents this week alone&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for a plane that has received&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2013/0109/Boeing-787-Dreamliner-glitches-How-serious-are-the-problems-video"&gt;numerous and varied complaints&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;since being launched in late 2011.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The order may not require the planes in service to be grounded, but will include a review of &amp;quot;critical systems,&amp;quot; including &amp;quot;the design,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/national_world&amp;amp;id=8950119"&gt;manufacture and assembly of the aircraft&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; Boeing has put 50 787 Dreamliners&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/12/business/faa-to-begin-a-review-of-boeing-787s.html?partner=rss&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;smid=tw-nytimes"&gt;into service around the world&lt;/a&gt;, but has orders to deliver 800 more in the next few years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	The&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/787_Dreamliner"&gt;787&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;was meant to be a revolution in aircraft design utilizing several new&amp;nbsp;techniques&amp;nbsp;and materials and ushering in a new era of commercial aircraft construction. However, the plane&amp;#39;s launch was delayed by several years and the planes have seen a host of glitches since going into service. Perhaps the most troubling problem for Boeing is that there is not one single flaw being discovered across the fleet, but&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2013/01/08/latest-787-dreamliner-glitch-sinks-boeing-but-details-remain-scarce/"&gt;a variety of different issues&lt;/a&gt;, from electrical problems to battery fires to cracks in the lightweight fiberglass structure.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&lt;a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2013/01/faa-orders-review-all-boeing-787-dreamliners/60870/"&gt;Read more at &lt;em&gt;The Atlantic Wire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
]]&gt;</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>