recommended reading

What Apple's all-American factory of the future might look like

Staff members work on the production line making Apple products at the Foxconn complex in Shenzhen, China

Staff members work on the production line making Apple products at the Foxconn complex in Shenzhen, China // Kin Cheung/AP File Photo

When Apple CEO Tim Cook revealed in an interview with Brian Williams airing Thursday night that Apple will begin building Macs in the United States next year, that's about all he said: We're coming to America — no how, no where, not even really a when. But strange as a stateside Apple factory may seem, Cook's comments come amid a wave of enthusiasm for producing things here. Two stories on the topic in the current issue of The Atlantic, along with a look at the challenges of Apple's past and the American economy's present, may offer a small window into Made in the U.S.A., Apple edition.

Once upon a time in America — the '80s, to be exact — Apple made its computers at the original Mac factory in Fremont, California (pictured here, via Flickr user JoshCUK). Developing the company's new factory, of course, won't be as simple as replacing those dated clunkers with skinny new iMacs: the Fremont factory, after all, failed. Part of the trouble, as explained in this two-part video tour, had to do with design flaws like conveyor belts that led to "excessive handling" and this inefficient ASRS system that "indicates high inventory and poor supply chain performance":

There was a basketball court, but Apple's 22nd-century-looking campus should handle the company's buildings in the looks department. What Apple wasn't able to handle in the U.S. the first time around was efficiency, something its notoriously dogged Foxconn plant has been able to achieve with "breathtaking" speed and flexibility, asNew York Times investigation reported earlier this year. Who needs basketball courts, the "iEconomy" seems to say, when you've got robots?

Read more at The Atlantic Wire

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion / Stolen credentials

85M User Accounts Compromised from Video-sharing Site Dailymotion

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.