recommended reading

Industry report recommends ramping up agencies' open government plans

Federal agencies haven't done enough to measure the extent of public participation resulting from their open government plans or to calculate what impact that public participation is having on agency decisions, according to an industry report released Monday.

Overall, agencies have made strides in increasing the level of public participation since President Obama launched an Open Government Initiative on his first day in office, according to the report from IBM's Center for the Business of Government.

Too often, though, that participation is cursory and agencies haven't made adequate efforts to educate the public about the program beforehand so they can give informed input rather than a gut reaction, the report said.

"To simply inform and to consult are 'thin,' frequently pro forma techniques of participation that often fail to meet the public's expectation for involvement and typically yield little in the way of new knowledge," the report said.

Government transparency groups largely gave high marks to agency open government plans, published after a lengthy period of public comment on Obama's larger open government directive.

But those agency plans, by and large, don't provide enough details to determine whether agencies will be getting "high quality public participation" or just the random thoughts from agency website trolls, the IBM report argues.

"While some agencies do include commitments to establish more robust measurements for participation," the report said, "few plans include indicators that would measure meaningful progress toward becoming more participatory."

High quality public participation should include sustained involvement from a diverse group of citizens who are well-versed in an agency's goals and mission and who can actively engage with policymakers, the report said.

Most agency open government plans focus on promoting public participation through online comment pages and town hall meetings, challenges -- such as an Agriculture Department-sponsored competition to develop mobile apps that promote healthy eating habits among children -- and crowdsourced wikis that cull information on a topic from experts across the country.

The report recommends the interagency Open Government Working Group develop guidance that spells out precisely how public participation should be measured, what's considered high-quality public participation and how agencies should respond to public comments.

The report also recommends agencies determine which issues the public is most concerned about and focus open government initiatives on those areas.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.