recommended reading

State-Based Obamacare Exchanges Cost Far More Than the Federal Marketplace

Hawaii spent $920 to enroll each new Obamacare consumer, while Florida spent only $16.

New data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation details the amount spent on consumer assistance for the Affordable Care Act in each state, and like overall enrollment numbers, the state totals vary a huge amount.

Consumer-assistance programs are those intended to help individuals understand and enroll in coverage under Obamacare, including the Navigator program, the In-Person Assister program, and Certified Application Counselors. The totals do not include funding for the exchange systems or other types of public and private outreach.

Overall, the state-based marketplaces spent far more to help get residents enrolled than states in the federal marketplace. State exchanges accounted for 50 percent of total consumer-assistance funds, yet have only 31 percent of all uninsured, according to RWJF. Federal marketplaces accounted for 33 percent of the funding but house 63 percent of the uninsured, and the five partnership states received 17 percent of the assistance funding, yet include only 6 percent of the total uninsured.

State-based exchanges had far more discretion over how much of their exchange establishment grants they would allocate for consumer assistance, while funding on the federal exchange was based to a larger degree on the number of uninsured residents. Thus state-based exchanges had a much larger range in assistance funding: While spending in federal-marketplace states ranged from $16 per enrollee in Florida to $186 per enrollee in Alaska, spending in state-based exchanges was across the board, from $40 in Idaho to $920 in Hawaii.

Top Five Spenders per Enrollee:

1. Hawaii: $920 per enrollee, $7,904,918 total (state-based exchange)

2. District of Columbia: $645 per enrollee; $6,906,057 total (state-based exchange)

3. Arkansas: $442 per enrollee; $19,211,296 total (partnership exchange)

4. West Virginia: $385 per enrollee; $7,647,178 total (partnership exchange)

5. Maryland: $385 per enrollee; $25,620,449 total (state-based exchange)

Bottom Five Spenders per Enrollee:

1. Florida: $16 per enrollee; $15,932,367 total (federal exchange)

2. Wisconsin: $20 per enrollee; $2,772,728 total (federal exchange)

3. Virginia: $20 per enrollee; $4,263,053 total (federal exchange)

4. Pennsylvania: $22 per enrollee; $6,905,518 total (federal exchange)

5. Georgia: $23 per enrollee; $7,194,944 total (federal exchange)

The state that spent most on consumer assistance was California, at $61,631,657 total. But California also enrolled the most people in coverage by far, with 1,405,102 Californians signed up for coverage through Covered California, the state exchange. Wyoming—part of the federal exchange—spent the least on consumer assistance, at $914,232, and enrolled 11,970 residents, the fourth-lowest number of all states.

The 25 lowest spenders per enrollee included only three state-based exchanges: Idaho, California, and Connecticut. The top half of big spenders included only six states in the federal exchange: Alaska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, and Mississippi.

"The availability of federal money and the type of marketplace were huge factors in the amount states spent to enroll the uninsured," said Katherine Hempstead, who leads coverage issues at the RWJF. "The real question, which can only be answered in time, is how big of a role states' consumer assistance programs played in overall enrollment success."

A number of other factors are at play as well, including functionality of the exchange system, the degree to which the state has embraced the health care law, and involvement of other enrollment outreach groups, whose funding is not included in these tallies.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • It’s Time for the Federal Government to Embrace Wireless and Mobility

    The United States has turned a corner on the adoption of mobile phones, tablets and other smart devices, outpacing traditional desktop and laptop sales by a wide margin. This issue brief discusses the state of wireless and mobility in federal government and outlines why now is the time to embrace these technologies in government.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • A New Security Architecture for Federal Networks

    Federal government networks are under constant attack, and the number of those attacks is increasing. This issue brief discusses today's threats and a new model for the future.

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Software-Defined Networking

    So many demands are being placed on federal information technology networks, which must handle vast amounts of data, accommodate voice and video, and cope with a multitude of highly connected devices while keeping government information secure from cyber threats. This issue brief discusses the state of SDN in the federal government and the path forward.

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.