recommended reading

Commentary: The Difference Between Obamacare and Other Disasters

New Orlean's hurricane-ravaged Lower 9th Ward in 2005. Comparisons have been made between the launch of Healthcare.gov and the handling of Hurricane Katrina.

New Orlean's hurricane-ravaged Lower 9th Ward in 2005. Comparisons have been made between the launch of Healthcare.gov and the handling of Hurricane Katrina. // Robert F. Bukaty/AP File Photo

HealthCare.gov has been compared to just about every catastrophe in recent and not-so-recent history: the Iraq War, the Battle of Waterloo, the Challenger disaster, and Hurricane Katrina. You can read those very nuanced smart takes all over the Internet. Here however, we're going to focus on a very important statistic associated with all of these disasters that has been resoundingly ignored: how many people actually died.

The New York Times in a 1,000-plus-word story by Michael Shear compared Obamacare's botched rollout to Hurricane Katrina. One thing he leaves out: 1,833 people died during Hurricane Katrina.

Host David Gregory on NBC's Meet the Press compared it to Iraq. Key stat: that war resulted in more than 110,000 violent deaths.

Former White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley compared it to the sinking of the Titanic. That killed some 1,500 people.

Duke professor Henry Petroski, writing in the New York Daily News, compared it to the 1986 explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. That killed seven.

Capitol Hill Blue's Callie Moran wondered whether the website rollout is Obama's Waterloo. Not sure if this affects the calculus, but more than 47,000 people died there.

To give those numbers some perspective: So far the biggest casualty of the catastrophic unmitigated government failure known as HealthCare.gov has been more than 106,000 people signing up for health insurance.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.