recommended reading

Commentary: The Difference Between Obamacare and Other Disasters

New Orlean's hurricane-ravaged Lower 9th Ward in 2005. Comparisons have been made between the launch of and the handling of Hurricane Katrina.

New Orlean's hurricane-ravaged Lower 9th Ward in 2005. Comparisons have been made between the launch of and the handling of Hurricane Katrina. // Robert F. Bukaty/AP File Photo has been compared to just about every catastrophe in recent and not-so-recent history: the Iraq War, the Battle of Waterloo, the Challenger disaster, and Hurricane Katrina. You can read those very nuanced smart takes all over the Internet. Here however, we're going to focus on a very important statistic associated with all of these disasters that has been resoundingly ignored: how many people actually died.

The New York Times in a 1,000-plus-word story by Michael Shear compared Obamacare's botched rollout to Hurricane Katrina. One thing he leaves out: 1,833 people died during Hurricane Katrina.

Host David Gregory on NBC's Meet the Press compared it to Iraq. Key stat: that war resulted in more than 110,000 violent deaths.

Former White House Chief of Staff Bill Daley compared it to the sinking of the Titanic. That killed some 1,500 people.

Duke professor Henry Petroski, writing in the New York Daily News, compared it to the 1986 explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. That killed seven.

Capitol Hill Blue's Callie Moran wondered whether the website rollout is Obama's Waterloo. Not sure if this affects the calculus, but more than 47,000 people died there.

To give those numbers some perspective: So far the biggest casualty of the catastrophic unmitigated government failure known as has been more than 106,000 people signing up for health insurance.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.