recommended reading

The Federal Government Is Charging With Deceiving Customers


The social-networking site secretly took information from Facebook to label millions "a jerk" and "not a jerk," the Federal Trade Commission said Monday.

FTC is seeking an order to stop from using improperly obtained personal information and to require the website to delete the information. An administrative judge will hear the case next January.

In what FTC called a "brazen attempt to exploit" peoples' concerns about their online reputation, the consumer-protection agency charged and its operator, Napster cofounder John Fanning, with deceiving more than 73 million consumers.

Between 2009 and 2013, the FTC says, millions of Americans searched themselves on search engines to find out that they had been labeled either a "Jerk" or "not a jerk" on Adding insult to injury, the website told consumers that they would have to pay a fee to revise their profile.

Visitors to the site believed that that their profiles were made by other users, but most profiles were actually created from information harvested surreptitiously from Facebook, according to the FTC.

Additionally, the agency said that the site told consumers that they could pay $30 to amend their profile or $25 to contact customer service, but those who did shell out money "received nothing" in exchange for their payment.

Profiles included photos and detailed personal information, including name, address, contact information, and even Social Security numbers in some cases. also let users vote on whether or not a person was a jerk and allowed for personal comments on user profiles. Comments were generally unkind, such as, "Omg I hate this kid he's such a loser," and, "Nobody in their right mind would love you … not even your parents love [you]."

(Image via jesadaphorn/

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.