recommended reading

Here’s How Government Can Help Startups


LAS VEGAS – Immigration and patent reform lead the checklist of things government can do to help entrepreneurs launch startup companies, a panel at the Consumer Electronics Show said, but those are just two items on a very long list.

A looser immigration policy would bring in more talented engineers and software coders to support entrepreneurs as well as foreign-born entrepreneurs themselves. Patent reform could reduce the anxiety among entrepreneurs and, more importantly, their investors that they’ll be hit with costly lawsuits from patent trolls, groups that don’t produce any products but own broad patents that they use to demand payments from companies they say are infringing on those patents.

Consumer Electronics Association President Gary Shapiro slammed patent trolls during a keynote presentation at CES and expressed similar views in a Nextgov post on Monday.

Here are some other ways government can help entrepreneurs, according to panelists:

Local governments should invest in high speed broadband, which could significantly reduce costs for startups, said Chet Kanojia, founder and CEO of Aereo, Inc., an online TV service.

Local government chief technology officers and chief innovation officers could spend more time boosting awareness of local startups on social media, said Mara Lewis, CEO and co-founder of, a service that allows people to check in Foursquare-style at their favorite websites. They could also help convene a local community of mentors and venture capitalists.

Local, state and federal officials and their staffs could engage more often and more directly with entrepreneurs in an effort to cut or reform regulations that make entrepreneurship difficult, said Josh Mendelsohn, co-founder of Engine Advocacy, a group that represents technology entrepreneurs before government officials.

“One notion I find a lot of entrepreneurs will accidentally adhere to is that government just needs to get out of the way,” Mendelsohn said. “I believe that’s naïve. We help early on bringing entrepreneurs to DC and to state capitals and we find a lot of staff and elected (officials) who want to support this technology and they’re users of this technology but they don’t understand what the regulations are that are keeping growth from occurring.” 

(Image via asharkyu/

Threatwatch Alert

Credential-stealing malware / User accounts compromised / Software vulnerability

Android Malware Infects More than 1M Phones, Adds 13,000 Devices a Day

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.