recommended reading

VA Offers Conflicting Accounts of Claims System's 'Spontaneous' Shutdowns

Spontaneous” shutdowns and other alleged glitches have not plagued the Veterans Affairs Department’s paperless claims processing system for close to a year, a VA executive told Senators Wednesday, undercutting testimony an official from department’s inspector general’s office gave lawmakers last week.

Such complaints are “dated,” Allison Hickey, VA’s undersecretary for benefits, said Wednesday during a hearing of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.

Last week, Sondra McCauley, VA deputy assistant inspector general for audits and evaluations, told a hearing of the House VA Committee that 25 staffers in the Houston, Newark and Milwaukee regional offices of the Veteran Benefits Administration experienced multiple problems with the $491 million paperless Veterans Benefits Management System or VBMS.

Those staffers “expressed frustration with the system in part because of spontaneous system shutdowns, latency issues related to slow times to download documents such as medical evidence for review, longer times to review electronic evidence, mislabeled electronic evidence, and mixing evidence from one veteran’s electronic file with another veteran’s,” McCauley said.

At the hearing Wednesday, Ranking Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., read this testimony to Hickey and asked, “Is that accurate?” 

Hickey replied: “That is a very dated perception,” from the IG. She “may have heard” about such problems a year ago, but not recently, Hickey added.   

A spokeswoman for the VA IG told Nextgov that the problems with VBMS cited by McCauley last week and by Burr on Wednesday surfaced in reviews conducted between June and August this year at the three VBA regional offices. "The reports were issued in June 2013 (Houston) and August 2013 (Milwaukee and Newark)," IG spokeswoman Catherine A. Gromek said in email.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.