recommended reading

Pentagon Biodefense Project Duplicates HHS Effort

David Mdzinarishvili/AP

A Defense Department biodefense facility under construction in Florida is widely seen as unnecessarily duplicating work carried out by the Health and Human Services Department, the Los Angeles Times reported on Saturday.

The Pentagon plant, once finished, would manufacture medical countermeasures for U.S. troops that could be used against biowarfare agents. Some of the expense of the facility is being paid for by reallocating Defense dollars intended for the purchase of new biodefense and chemical protection gear and equipment, according to government records and security experts.

The Health and Human Services Department is already cooperating with university scientists and pharmaceutical firms at a cost of billions of dollars to produce the same kinds of biowarfare countermeasures as the Pentagon facility is expected to manufacture.

Construction began late last month. The military is pursuing the project against the recommendation of a 2009 report ordered by the White House. The analysis by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development recommended that the government work with private industry to acquire the needed medicines as "contract manufacturing is less costly and timelier than constructing and operating a dedicated facility."

However, Andrew Weber, assistant Defense secretary for nuclear, chemical and biological defense programs, pushed for the facility. He reportedly thought his HHS opposites were moving too slowly in securing steady sources for the production of vaccines and countermeasures.

"We started off talking about doing this together," said an anonymous HHS official who participated in the 2010 interagency biodefense discussions.

After a while, though, it became clear that Weber did not want the HHS Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority -- which funds the development of medicines for use against weapons of mass destruction -- to have superseding control over countermeasure production, according to the Times report.

The Pentagon "wanted to be in charge of their own fate," another unnamed HHS official said.

Weber's vision won the support of the White House in late 2010 when President Obama's then-chief counter-terrorism adviser, John Brennan, signed off on a document that said the Pentagon should "establish agile and flexible advanced development and manufacturing capabilities."

The department anticipates it will cost $40 million annually over the coming five years to run the Florida facility, said James Petro, a senior aide to Weber. Additional monies would be needed to purchase any medicines produced there.

Threatwatch Alert

Thousands of cyber attacks occur each day

See the latest threats

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Close [ x ] More from Nextgov
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from Nextgov.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

    Download
  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

    Download
  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

    Download
  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

    Download
  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.