recommended reading

Senate Dems Push for Independent Commission to Review Russian Election Meddling

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., left center, and Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., right center, question intelligence leaders Feb. 9, 2016.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., left center, and Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., right center, question intelligence leaders Feb. 9, 2016. // Alex Brandon/AP

Five Senate Democrats introduced legislation Wednesday to create an independent, nonpartisan commission to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

The bill follows similar legislation introduced last Congress in the House.

“An attack against our election system is an attack on our very way of life and must not go unchallenged,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a bill sponsor and the incoming ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement.

» Get the best federal technology news and ideas delivered right to your inbox. Sign up here.

The eight commissioners would be appointed two each by the top Democrat and Republican in the House and Senate and should be “prominent United States citizens with national recognition and significant depth of experience in professions such as governmental service, law enforcement, armed services, law, public administration, intelligence gathering, cybersecurity, election administration, and foreign affairs,” according to the bill.

The nature of the commission's work would likely necessitate the members already had high-level security clearances.

Commissioners would have access to all classified and unclassified intelligence information about Russian actions to influence the election as well as subpoena power, according to a fact sheet.

They would be tasked with making recommendations to Congress and the executive branch within 18 months in both classified and unclassified forms, including a plan to counter future interference.

Other sponsors are outgoing Homeland Security ranking member Tom Carper, D-Del., and Sens. Ben Cardin, D-Md., Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.

A coalition of 15 bipartisan former foreign policy and defense officials also called for an independent commission investigation in a Wednesday statement, including former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and former 9/11 Commission Co-chair Lee Hamilton.

Basing the review outside of Congress will “ensure that the investigation is comprehensive and not siloed within a certain congressional committee’s jurisdiction,” that statement notes.

“Anything less than a swift investigation will leave us vulnerable to another attack and, possibly worse, permit and normalize future interference,” the former officials state.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., have insisted thus far all congressional probes into the election meddling should be managed in regular order by those chambers’ intelligence committees.

President-elect Donald Trump has consistently said he does not believe the intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government was responsible for data breaches at Democratic political organizations that wreaked havoc on the campaign of his opponent, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

His most frequent argument is that it is simply too difficult to make strong attributions in cyberspace, a mostly dubious claim.  

Trump said he would be briefed on the attribution early this week but later tweeted the briefing was delayed until Friday. Intelligence officials disputed that the briefing had actually been delayed, according to TV reports.

“The ‘Intelligence’ briefing on so-called ‘Russian hacking’ was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!” Trump tweeted.

He also tweeted the hacked Democratic National Committee did not have “hacking defense,” which left it vulnerable. In fact, DNC cyber defenses were subverted by a phishing email an employee mistakenly clicked, allowing hackers to bypass those defenses.  

Trump’s refusal to accept the conclusion reflects “very sincere and healthy skepticism about American intelligence conclusions,” Vice President-elect Mike Pence said Wednesday during an appearance with congressional leaders.

Incoming Senate Intelligence ranking member Mark Warner, D-Va., shot back during an MSNBC appearance that “the most important thing the intelligence community can always do is speak truth to power and it seems like perhaps the president-elect doesn't want to hear those truths.”

The sniping comes amid a larger dispute between the two administrations. President Barack Obama announced a slate of retaliations against Russia last week, including sanctioning Russian intelligence agencies and top intelligence officials and expelling 35 Russian diplomats from the U.S. who the State Department claims are actually spies.

Trump suggested he might reverse those actions after he takes office Jan. 20 and praised Russian President Vladimir Putin on Twitter for not immediately striking back.

Obama has ordered a separate review of foreign hacking related to U.S. elections dating back to 2008. Intelligence officials will deliver that report before Obama leaves office. 

Threatwatch Alert

Network intrusion

Florida’s Concealed Carry Permit Holders Names Exposed

See threatwatch report


Close [ x ] More from Nextgov

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Modernizing IT for Mission Success

    Surveying Federal and Defense Leaders on Priorities and Challenges at the Tactical Edge

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • Effective Ransomware Response

    This whitepaper provides an overview and understanding of ransomware and how to successfully combat it.

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.